-ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECORD JOURNAL OF VARIATION DITED ]5Y J. AV. TUTT, F.E.S. Assisted by T. HUDSON BEARE, B.sc, f.e.s., f.u.s.k. M. BURR, B.A., F.Z.S., F.L.s., K.E.s. T. A. CHAPMAN, m.u., k.z.s., f.e.s. L. H. PROUT, F.E.S. H. St. J.K.DONISTHORPE, f.z.s. f.e.s. VOL. XIV. JANUARY TO DECEMBER. 1902. PRICE 7s. 6d. Special Index (with every reference) Is. LONDON : ELLIOT STOCK, 62, Paternoster Row, E.G. BERLIN : R. FRIEDLANDER Sc SOHN, 11, Carlstrasse N.W. NEW YORK: Ph. HEINSBERGER, 9. First Avenue, New York. U.S.A. (5?U^^* PREFACE. -s^ Another volume has been completed and we have again to thank CUV subsciibers and contributors for their excellent support during the past year. There has been no special feature like the " century " articles of the last volume, but the volume contains a large amount of most important and useful entomological detail, which has, we believe, kept it quite up to the level of its best traditions. The work of the assistant editors has been especially onerous this year. The coleoptera section under Professor T. Hudson Beare and Mr. H. St. J. K. Donisthorpe has been rather heavier than usual, and Mr. M. Burr maintains well the interest of our orthopterists in the work that is going on in their special branch of our subject. The help of Dr. T. A. Chapman and Mr. L. B. Prout with the lepidoptera, has again been of the utmost value to ourselves and our readers. Help in the production of the plates pulished Avith this volume is gratefully acknowledged, we have to thank Dr. T. A. Chapman, the Eev. A. M. Moss, the Hon. N. C. Rothschild, and Mr. DoUman. To the latter our readers are indebted for the beautiful handpainted larva of Dicranura bictiHpis, every copy of which was coloured by the a"tist himself. Owing to an unfortunate affection of the eyes, from which Mr. G. B. Routledge is suffering, extra help in the preparation of the Special Index has had to be obtained. ]\Ir. H. J. Turner is helping Mr. Routledge with the lepidoptera. Professor T. Hudson Beare is doing the coleoptera, and Mr. M. Burr the orthoptera. Whilst regretting exceedingly the necessity for obtaining further help, we are exceedingly grateful to those who have so kindly offered their services. We trust that Mr. Routledge, to whose kindness Ave have been indebted so long, will soon recover from Avhat Ave hope is but a temporary disability. It is hoped that the " Special Index" will be ready Avith the January number. We regret to add that, Avhilst this has been passing through the press, Miss E. Wells, Avho has for many years been responsible for the " general index " of this magazine, and had only a few days before completed that published Avith this number, died suddenly of apoplexy on December 5th. We again ask for a supply of short notes and observations, Avhich should in reality be not at all difficult to obtain. It Avould appear, however, that such are really more rarely penned than one might fairly expect. I may here point out that the compilation of really good text-books must depend largely on an abundance of such notes made by isolated Avorkers. These notes become of the highest scientific importance Avhen collected together for the purposes of generalisation. Similarly, notes on collecting — Avith dates, observ'ations and localities — are exceedingly valuable. In conclusion we beg to tender our heartiest thanks to our sub- scribers and contributors, and to everyone who has in any Avay contri- buted to make the volume a success. r i(i3ecAs , Pi.. I. Vol,. XIV STlurn-l!,\I. DKTMIS or OltCVIA Sl'LENliIDA. Eutom. Record, etc., 190'^. The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation. VOL. XIY. SPECIAL INDEX. By T. HUDSON BEARE, F.R.S.E., M. BURR, B.A., F.E.S., G. B. ROUTLEDGE, F.E.S., and H. J. TURNER, F.E.S. Colcuptera arranged in order of (reiiera. The other ordera arranijcd bij iSpecu'! VAC.K. PAGE. ACARINA. COLEOPTERA. bostocki, Glyphopsis .. 68 Acalles tuibatus .. 76 Acidota crenata .. 79 coccinea, Glyphopsis . . m Acilius snlcatus 83, 337 Actobius einerasceiis .. 79 equitans, Leolaps . . . . (59 pvoceiulus .. 335 signatieoniis .. 335 forraicariae, Glyphopsis . . . »;i) Acupalpus flavicollis .. 337 mevidianus .. 337 lamellosa, Glyphopsis .. 68 Adrastus limbatus . . . . 79 Aegialia arenaria ■. . . . 79 myrmecophilus, Leolaps . . . oy rufa . . . . 242, 243, 336 sabuleti 79, 297, 340 ricasoliana, Uropoda . . 61) Agabus aicticus .. 78 bipustulatus . . 2 41, 296, 337 uhlmanni, Antennophorus . . ()'.» chalconatus .. 337 congener . . .. 78 ARACHNOID EA. oonspei'sus .. 77 hahnii, Chthonius . . .. 67 guttatus . . .. 223 nebulosus . . .. 337 muscorum, Obrisium .. 67 sturmii .. 337 uliginosus. . .. 77 layi, Chthonius .. 67 Agathidium marginatum . .. 336 Agrilus sinuatus 8 ARANEINA viridis Aleochara algarum . . .. 8 .. 338 Agelenidae . . . . 68 bipunctata .. 78 arietinus, Tetrilus . . .. 67 cuniculoruni .. 78 grisea 78, 338 biovata, Thyreosthenius . .. 67 morion .. 78 obscurella . . 78, 338 divisa, Cryphoeca . . .. 68 ruficornis . . .. 185 Drassus .. 68 succicola . . 78, 337 Alexia pilit'era . . 37 festivus, Phrurolithus ,. 68 Alianta plumbea .. 338 Amara apricaria .. 338 hombergi, Harpactes .. 68 bifrons .. 77 communis .. 338 innotabilis, Microneta .. 68 consularis.. 77, 338 convexiuscula .. 338 labyrinthica, Agelena .. 349 fulva .. 77 lunicollis . . 77, 338 pratensis, Hahnia . . .. 68 ovata 77, 338 pnlicaria, Micaiia . . .. 68 plebeia . 223, 240 ruiocincta . . .. 296 scintillas, Micaria . . .. 68 Ammoecius brevis . . .. 336 Anacaena globulus . . .. 338 troglodytes, Drassus .. 68 Anchomenus angusticollis. .. 296 gracilis .. 323 viaria, Microneta . . .. 6« junceus . . 340 in ens .. 268 SPEICIAL INDEX. PAGE. 1 PACK. oblongus . . • * • • 338 var. chorinaeus .. 154 parumpunctatus . . 223 claudicans 150, 152, 154, 155 piceus 267 cylindrus . . 151, 153, 154 viduus 240 diglyptus . . 152, 154, 155 vur. moestus . . 77, 240 encaustus . . 153 Ancistronycha abdomina: is 79, 185 frit.. .. 152, 154, 155, 156 Ancyrophorus 79 glabrirostris 150 152, 154, 155 Anisodactylus binotatus var. spur- var. (?) . . 152 caticovnis 240 var. iiigritarsis 152 poeciloides 338 incei-atus . . 153 Anisotoiua calcarata '. '. 76, 2ti6 laticollis . . 153 ciliaris 336 limosus . . 152, 153, 154, 155 dubia 76 lutosns 155, 156 furva 336 lutulentiis.. 155 Anitys rubens 76 lutulosus . . 150, 152, 154, 155 Anobiuiii domesticuni 8 nigritarsis 150, 156 Anoplus plaiitaris . . 241 nodulosus . . 150, 151, 153 roboris 268 petro . . 151, 152, 154, 155 Anthaxia nitidula . . 8 petrosus . . 154 Antheiophagus silaceus 268 subcarinatus 154", 155 Anthicus biniaculatus 336 tempestivus 152, 154 scoticLis . . 185 var. Heasleri . . 152 Anthobiuiu torquatum 242 Bembidium . . 9, 267 Anthophagus testaceus 242 atline 77 Aphodius 7, 284 argenteolum 223, 252 depresses . . 240 atrocoeruleum 296 fimetarius.. . . 283, 284 bipuiictatum '77 296, 339 foetens . . 288, 284 bruxellense 296 lossDr 319 clarki 335 inquinatus 75 decorum . . 296 pusillus . . 79 doris 77, 297 rufipes 319 ephippium 338 sordidus . . 75 fuinigatum 268 Aphthona nonstriata 223 guttula 223 Apion aeaeum 297 lampros . . 223 cerdo 80 littorale 296 frumentariurii 223 maunerheimi 338 hookeri 76 minimum . . 338 nigritarse . . 223 monticola.. 296 huniile 2'.) 7 uigricorne.. 77, 337 radiolus . . 297 obliquum . . 2(i7 scutellare . . 76 obtusum . . 223 urticarium 26.S paludosum 77 252, 339 vernale 75 piasiiium . . 223 Aroniia moschata . . .' ' 287, 336 quadriguttatum . . 338 Asenmin striatum . . 79, 185 saxatile 77, 338 Aspidlphorus orbiculatiis 7C) sehuppeli . . 77, 185 Astilbiis canaliculatus 296 striatum . . 33S .\teineles einarginatus 76 tibiale 296 Ateuchus laticollis . . 75 Bidessus ge minus . . 83 sacer 75 unistiiatus 268 Athousdili'onuis 268 Blechrusmaurus 338 haeiiiorrhoidalis . . 339 Bledius atricapillus. . 338 vittatus 33i» b;cornis 33.S Attohibus c-urculioiides . . 8, 80 331) longulus . . 335 Alitalia impressa 337 opacus pallipes 79, 335 79 Badister bipustulatus 337 spectabilis 336, 338 sodalis 337 subterraneus 76 iJalaninus brassicae 21)7 lilethisa niultipunctata 240, 267, 297 Bagous adspersus . . 155 Bolitobius lunulatus 337 alisniatis . . 150, 152, 155 156 pygmaeus . . 296, 337 argillaceus 150, 151 153 trinotatus . . 296, 337 binodulns . . 150, 151 153 Bolitochara bella . . , , 76 brevis 152, 154 155 obliqua .. 78 SPECIAL INDEX. PAGE. 1 PAGi;. Bothyioderes albidus 47 cisteloides . . 79 Brachelytra 8 spadicea . . 79 Biachinus crepitans 338 Choragus sheppard i 2(iS Brachyptei'us gravidus 336 Chi'ysomela banksi . 340 pubescens . . 266 cerealis s, 23'.l Bradycellus cognatus 296 lamina 340 collaris 77, 296 staphylea 223 distinctus . . 77 Cicindela campestris 296 harpalinus 337 Cissophagus hederae 7(> placidus . . 296 Clambus minutuH . . ,',M] siniilis 2iJG, 337 pubescens.. 336 verbasci . . 77 Cleonus alteraaus . . 47 Bruehidae . . 196 ophthalmicus 47 Bruchus atomarius. . s sulcirostris ISC, fahraei 8 Clinocara undulata . . 241 incarnatus s Clivina collaris 76 luteicornis 8 Clythra quadripunctata 79, 194 pectiniconiis 8 Coccidula scutellata 268 rufipes H Coccinella . . 75 viciae 8 hieroglyphica 266 Brychius elevatus . . 77, 223 septempunctata . . 73 Bryaxis juncoruni . . 223 transversoguttata 74 Buprestis ancylocheira 72 undecimpunctata rar. cuiitlaeus bifasciata . . 46 99, 240 sanguiuea. . % 89 Coecinellidae Colenis dentipes 73, 100 76 Caiius fucicola 338 Colon appendiculatuiii 79 sericeus 338 Conurus littoreus . . 223 Calathus cisteloides 296, 337 Coptocycla bistripuiu^tata . . 100 flavipes 296, 337 Corymbites aeneus . . 297 melanocephalus . . 290, 337 cupreus var. aeruginosus 339 var. nubigena . . 296, 337 impressus. . 339 piceus 338 quercus 339 Callidium violacemn 185 var. ochropterus 339 Calosoma inquisitor 99 Cossonidae . . 1.52 var. coeruleuni . . 9<» Creophilus maxillosus rdr. i-i iari^ 240 Cantharis nuttallii . . 75 Crioceris asparagi . . 31'.t Carabidae . . 76, 99 Cryphalus fagi 76 Carabup arvensis 296 Cryptarcha imperialis 76 catenulatns 296 strigata 7(i clatbratus . . 240 Cryptocephalus parvulu^. car. bar- glabratus . . 76, 296 bareae 268 granulatus 76, 240 Cryptophypnus riparius . . 26(; lefebvrei . . 99 Cryptorhynchus lapathi . . 319 Cassida 100 Curculionidae 196 equestris . . 223 Cymindis vaporarioruni 77, 296 337 flaveola 223, 336 Cerambycidae 196 Deliphrum tectum . . 79 Ceuthorbynchidius ehevrolati 268 Deinopsis erosa 76 268 floralis 297 Deporaus megacephaliis . . 80 mixtns 8 Deronectes depressus 77. 223 296 Ceuthorhynchus asperifoliaruni . , 76 12-pustulatus . . 77, 223 337 assimilis . . 297 Diabrotica longicoriiis 319 contractus 2il 297 Diaperis boleti 185 cyanipennis 242 265 Dibolia cynoglossi . . 265 echii 268 Diehirotrichus obsolet.us . . 338 erysimi 297 Diglossa mersa 338 picitarsis . . 297 Doloi^ius marginatum 339 quadridens . . 242 , 265 297 Donacia affinis 79 rapae 297 versicolora 79 336 eulcicollis . . 242' 297 Dorcadion 73 Chaetocnema hortensis 266 Dorcatoma chi-ysonioiina. . . 267 Chlaenius vestitus . . 337 Havicornis 268 Choleva angustata . . , 79 Doryphora dccimlineala . . 319 ehrysonieloides . . .. 337 Dromius agilis 241 SPECIAL INDEX. PAGE. PAGE. linearis 338 puncticoUis .. 241 melanocephalub . . '. 223, 338 rotundicollis .. 337 nigriventris 77 lubripes . . . . 337 quadrimaculatus 223 ruHcornis . . .. 337 vectensis . . 338 lupicola . . . . 338 Dryocaetes autographus . 200 tardus .. 77 Dryophilus pusillus 339 tenebrosus .. 338 Dyschirius aeneus . . 337 Helniinthimoiphus aubei . .. 151 impunctipennis . . 76 Helodes niarginata . . .. 242 obscurus . . 252 Helophorus aequalis .. 78 salinus 76, 337 aivevnicus .. 78 Dytiscus circumflexus 194 intemiedius .. 338 iiiarginalis 83, 337 Henicocerus exsculptus 78, 337 punctulatus 337 Heptaulacus villosus Heterocerus brittanicus .. 336 .. 79 Elaphrus 252 Heterothops binotata . . 338 cupreas . 223, 297 Hippodamia ambigua .. 75 Elater balteatus 339 lecontei . . .. 74 miniatus . . 240 Homalium deplanatum 79, 336 pomonae . . 240 planum .. 79 Elmis aeneus 79, 223, 241 rivulare . . .. 337 cupreus 79, 241 Homaloplia ruricola . . 76 paiallelopipedus . . 79 Homalota currax . . .. 78 subviolaceus 79, 194 exilis .. 335 volkmari . . 79 fungicola . . .. 337 Encephalus complicans 8 graminicola. . .. 223 Enedientes hilaris . . 338 hiilobrectha .. 333 Epuraea decemguttata 76 insecta .. 78 Erirhiniis acridulus 297 luridipennis .. 78 Ernobius mollis 297 pavens .. 78 Euplectus karsteni . . 336 xanthoptera .. 337 piceus 336 Hydnobius punctatissimus .. 336 sanguineus 76 Hydraena atricapilla .. 78 signatus . . 336 gracilis .. 78 Euryporus picipes . . 78 riparii^ .. 223 Exomias araneiformis 266 Hydrobius picicrus. . Hydronomus alismatis .. 337 . 152, 156 Gastroidea polygoni 2(;5 Hydroporus davisi 77, 223, 296 Geodromicus nigrita 223 erythrocephalus . . .. 337 Gnathoncus nannetensis . 336 ferrugineub .. 77 Grammopteia ruticornis . 339 gyllenhali . . .. 337 Gyninetron coUinus 337 incognitus .. 337 linariae . . 337 lepidus .. 223 Gymnusa variegata 296 lineatus . . .. 77 Gyrinidae 84 melanarius .. 241 Gyrinus minutus . . 296 niemnonius .. 77 Gyiophaena manca 78 niorio obscurus . . .. 337 . . 77 Habrocerus eapillaricornis 335 palustris . . 83,296, 337 Haeniatobia serrata 319 planus .. 296 Haliijlus riavicollis . . 338 rivalis 77, 223. 296 fulvus 337 rutifrons . . .. 77 ruticollis . . . 290, 338 septentrionalis . . 77, 296 variegatus 83 tristis .. 241 Haltica 297 vittula .. 77 Halticid:ie . . 2(io Hydrothassa hannoveraua 79, 185 Halyzia 14-guttata. . 223 marginella .. 223 Ib-guttata.. 241 Hydrovatus clypealis . 166, 338 Haipalus aeneus . 29H 337 Hylastes .. 78 azureus . 337 33S ater .. 76 i-upreus 338 opacus . . 76 fi-ulieliii 9 palliatus . . .. 76 latus '. 29t;' 337 Hylecoetus dermestoides . .. 24U cur. erythi'ocephalus . 337 Hylesinus crenatus. . .. 80 neglettus . . 335 oleiperda . . . . 268 SPECIAL INDEX. Y. PAGE. PAGE. vittatus .. 80 inclinans .. 296 Hypera elongata .. 336 Megarthrus depressus .. 337 polygoni . . .. 265 Megilla vittigera .. 75 punctata . . 186, 223 Melandrya barbata . . .. 8 suspiciosa . . .. 336 canalieulata .. 8 Melasoma aeueum . . .. 340 Ilyobates nigricollis 76, 338 Meligethes aeneus . . .. 266 Ips quadriguttatus . . .. 337 viridescens .. 266 Metoecus paradoxus .. 308 Laccophilus minutus .. 83 Miarus campanula . . .. 76 obscLirus . . 77, 337 Micropeplus staphylinoides .. 79 Laemostenus complanatus .. 266 Miscodera arctica . . 296, 337 Lampyris noctiluca .. 8 Monotoma quadricoUis .. 336 Larinus carlinae . . .. 267 rufa .. 336 scolymi .. 7 Mycetophagus .. 267 Lathridius bergrothi .. 7 multipunctatus . . .. 79 testaceus . . .. 76 piceus .. 267 Lathrobium boreale .. 337 quadripustulatus. . .. 79 brunnipes.. .. 337 Myeetoporus angularis .. 335 fulvipenne .. 296 splendens . . .. 338 longulum . . .. 335 splendidus .. 223 quadra turn 79, 335 Mylabris quadripunctata . .. 72 Lebia crux-minor . . .. 185 Myrmedonia limbata 335, 338 Leistotrophus murinus .. 338 eoUaris .. 17 Leistus ferrugineus .. 337 rufescens . . .. 337 Nebria brevicollis . . .. 296 Lema erichsoni . . 240, 241, 268 gyllenhalli .. 296 septentrionis .. 240 Necrophorus humator .. 296 Leptacinus parumpunctatus .. 335 mortuorum .. 296 Leptinus testaceus .. 76 Nephanes titan .. 336 Leptoceris tvivittata .. 319 Niptus crenatus .. 297 Leptusa fumida .. 78 hololeucus .. 297 Limnebius papposus .. 338 Noterus sparsus .. 338 Limnius 8 Nomius pygmaeus . . .. 319 Limobius mixtus . . .. 186 Notiophilus aquaticus .. 296 Limonius minutus . . .. 79 palustris . . .. 296 Liodes humeralis . . .. 76 substriatus .. 337 Liophloeus nubilus. . .. 265 Liosomus oblongulus .. 76 Oberea oculata .. 185 ovatulus . . .. 297 Ochthebius aeratus. . .. 338 Lissodenia 4-pustulata . . 76 bicolon 78, 338 Lixus algirus .. 268 margipallens .. 338 paraplecticus .. 185 marinus . . ?8. 335, 338 Lochmaea crataegi . . .. 339 punctatus . . .. 338 Longicornia . . .. 79 rutimarginatus . . .. 78 Longitarsus anchusae . . 223 Ocypus brunnipes . . 296, 335 ballotae .. 340 Odontaeus mobilieornis 8 laevis .. 267 Oligota atomavia .. 338 melanocephalus . . .. 223 punctulata .. 338 Lyprus eylindrus . . 151 Olisthopus rotundatus 296, 337 Lytta vesicatoria . . . . H. 75, 239 Olophrum pieeuni . . .. 296 Orchestes fagi .. 241 Magdalis armigera . - .. 339 Orina tristis var. smaragdir a .. 308 Malachius mai'ginellus .. 267 Orobitis cyaneus .. 337 Malthinus frontalis. . .. 79 Oroehares angustatus 8 Malthodes atomus . . .. 339 Orthoeaetes setiger. . . . 336 marginatus .. 297 Orthocerus muticus .. 336 sanguinolentus . . .. 297 Othius laeviusculus .. 338 Mantura chrysanthemi .. 336 myrmecophilus . . .. 296 rustica .. 266 Otiorhynchus auropunctatu s .. 252 Medon castaneus . . 8 blandus .. 297 obsoletus . . .. 335 mnsconun 266, 297 propinquus .. 338 Oxypoda alternanii . . .. 3.37 rupicola . . .. 338 lividiponnis .. 223 Megacronus analis . . .. 296 opaca .. 241 SPECIAL INDEX. PAUK. 1 PAGE. Pacbyta eerambyciformis . . 7i», 185 Psammobiue sulcicollis 336 PaederuR littoralis . . 338 Pseudopsis sulcata . . 330 Parnus auriculatus.. 297 Psylliodes cupronitens 297 prolifeiieornis 297 napi 223 Patrobus assimilis . . 290 Pterostichus diligens 223 Perileptus aieolatus 240 lepidus 77 Phaedon tnniidulum 223, 2G5 minor 335, 338 Philhydius maritinius 33H niger 290 minutus . . 337 nigrita 296 Philonthus aeneus . . 337 strenuus . . 290 carbonarius 78 versicolor . . 240 (limidiatus 207 vitreus 296 fumarius . . 338 Ptilinus pectinicornis 336 intermedins 78 Ptomaphagus sericens 337 lucens 338 micans 33.''> Quedionnchus laevigatus . . 296 nigrita 7.S Quedius attenuatuR . . 223 nigriventris 78', 79 auricomuR 78 politus . . . . Ti). 223, 337 boops 297 proximus 78 eruentus . . . . 297, 298, 335 qiiisquiliarius 297 var. virens 297. 298, 335 quisquiliarius rnr. dimidintns . . 267 fulgidus . . 335 BCUtatUR . . 75 fuliginoRus 337 varius 223 impresRus 298 ventralis . . 78 lateralis . . 78 vernalis . . 241 molochinuR 337 Pbloeotrya stephensi 267 obliteratuR . . 266, 267, 835 Phthora eienata 7 rutipes 223 Phyllobius calcaratus 242 suturaliR . . . . 266, 267, 335 niacnlicornis rnr. cinereus 242 tristis 337 oblongus . . 241 umbrinus . . 78, 223 unifovmi.s . . 20.-) xanthopuR 78 viridicollis Phyllodeeta cuvifrons isr). vitellinae . . Phyllopertha hoiticoia Phyllotieta nemormii 241, 241, 241, 242 242 223 240 242 llhagium bifasciatum Ehantus biHtriatus . . exoletus . . . . 78, Ehinosimus viridipennis . . 78, 241, 339 296 337 265 undulata 241, 242 Bhizophagus lerrugineus . . 76 Phytobius quadritiiberculatiis waltoni Phytonoiuus punefatus Phytosus balticus . . nigriventriR so'. 20(; 208 319 33S 335 Rhizotrogus ochraceus solsti till lis. . IlhopalomeRites tardyi Rhynchites cupreiiR uncinnatus 80 .354 355 252 339 80 spinifer 338 Rhyneophora 78 Pissodes pini «0 Saperda populnea . . 79 Pityophagus fennginens . . 7(; 79 scalariR .335 339 PlaeuBa complanata 78 Saprinus quadriRtriatuR 330 Platambus maculatus 223 290 SearabeiiR sacer 47 Platydema violaceum s Sciaphilus muricatus 265 Platystethus nitens. . 33H Scirtes orbicularis . . 268 Platytarsns echinatus 205 Scolytidae i9(; Plecfroscelis coiiciiina 242 ScopaeuR RulcicolliR 338 Pocadius ferrngineus 337 Scydmaenus elongatuR 7() Podabrns alpinus . . 339 Scymnus nigrinviR . . 79 Podagrioa fuscipes . . 208 Serica brunnea 297 Pogonus chalceus . . 77 338 mixta 75 luridipennis 338 Serieosomus brnnneiis 339 Polydrusus rhrysomela 80 Silpha atrata 297 micans 339 var. subrotundata 252 undatus . . 339 rugosa 297 Poophagus nastuitii 80 Silvanus RurinamenRis 79 8isymbrii . . 80 Sinodendron cylindrionm . . 79 Prionus coiiaiius . . 2C7 288 Sipalia luticollis 78 Pristonjchus terricola 266 Sitones puncticollis 265 ProteinuR ovalis 337 Smicronyx . . 7(5 SPECIAL INDEX. Snrnnia grisea Sphaevites sLibratus Sphindus dubius Staphylinus caesareus erythropterus pubescena. . stercorarius Stenolophus plagiatus Stenus aerosus argentellus ater bifoveolatus binotatus . . bupthalmus cicindeloides declaratus. . forniratus guttula guynemeri ossiuin pallitarsis. . palposus . . picipennis.. picipes pubescens. . siniilis Stilicus rulipes Strophosomus lateralis Sunius aogustatus . . Tachinns collaris .. humeral is . . marginellus rufipep Tachyporus formosus Tachys bistriatus . . parvulus . . scutellaris.. Tachyusa coiistricta Tanynieeus palliatus Taphria nivalis Tarsotenus univittatus Telephoius darwinianus haemorrhoidalis . . obscurus . . paludosus . . Telmatophilas brevicilUs sparganii . . typhae Tetrops praeusta . . Thalycra sericea Thamiaraea cinnaniomea Thinobius brevipennis Tomicus laricis Toxotus meridianus Trechus discus iapidosus . . micros minutus . . obtusus secalis Triphyllus suturalis Trogophloeus bilineatus corticinus . . pusillus 78, 296 223 79 23, 241, 223 29(' tAUK. 7(1 185 7(J 240 240 240 335 7 338 252 338 79 338 252 79 223 7(i 79 79 338 79 252 223 223 79 338 338 297 338 337 337 337 337 240 338 109 338 78 80 290 8 33(; 339 241 79 2! -,7 2o7 267 79 70 70 335 70 79 77 240 77 337 223 337 79 79 335 335 PAOH. rivularis .. .. .. 79, 335 tenellus . . . . . . . . 330 Trop deres hilaris . . . . . . 338 Tropiphorus mercurialis . . . . 242 Tychius squamulatus . . . . 337 Velleius dilatatus . . . . . . 8 Xantholinus cribripennis . . 223, 252 distans . . . . . . . . 252 Xenusa sulcata . . . . . . 338 uvida . . . . • • • • 338 CRUSTACEA. hoffiiianseggii, Platyarthrus . . 69 Platyarthrus . . . . . . 69 DIPTERA. Anopheles An thorny idae arcuatus, Syrphus . . argentifera, Meriania argyropus, Culex auricollis, Syrphus . . balteatus, Syrphus . . Bibio boreal is, Sericomyia brasiliensis, Systropus Calliphora . . Cecidomyidae chameleon, Stratiomys Chirononius . . Chlorops chrysitis, Machimus chrysorrhoea, Physocephal citripennis, Neniorius clavipes, Holopogon corollae, Syrphus . . crassipes, Aiherix . . . C'dastria . . 273, 351, fasciaiia, Ellopia zide prosapiaria, ] faseiaria, Hylaea fasciellus, Nematois fasciuncula. Miana. . ab. suli'usa fausta, Anthiocera . . . . 88, favicolor, Leucania. . ferrugalis, Pionea . . ferchaultella, Luft'ui 218, 220, festiva (primulae), Noctua 190, 302, ah. caerulea (lb. yrisea iur. ihulei festucae, Plusia . . . . 206, tiidia, Satyrus .. 71,89,119, Fidoniidae . . timbria, Triphaena 132, 134, 181, 271. 285, 300. filigrammaria, Opoiabia 269, 301, 182 167 3U7 IMS 349 182 182 260 104 168 182 117 181 116 182 248 344 149 149 149 314 121 202 353 306 . PAGE. fimbriata, Agrotis . . . . . . 181 fiiubriata, Eriocranla . . . . 261 lilipendulae, Anthrocera (Zygaena) 167, 226, 227, 326, 349, 353 tilipendulae, Nepticula . . . . 261 tissipuneta (ypsilon), Dysohorista ah. (et var.) nigrescens . . 187 ab. variegata . . . . . . 187 tiammea, Meliaua . . . . 108, 284 fiamuiealis, Endotriclia . . 344, 347 flavago, Citria . . 83, 134, 300 flavalis, Pyiausta . . flavella, Depressaria Haveolaria, Acidalia tlaviciliaua, Eupoecilia fiavicincta, Polia . . Havicinctata, Larentia var. obscuratii, . . fiavicornis, Asphalia ..182 ..110 .. 328 ..204 167, 304, 306 .. 302 ..203 110, 161, 218, 219 var. gal ban us . . . . . . 188 flavofasciata, Eriocrania . . . . 61 lietcheri, Nepticula. . .. .. 261 flexula, Aventia . . . . . . 347 lloralis, Noctuelia . . . . . . 182 fluctuata, Melanippe 133, 134, 251, 300 ab. (et I'ar.) thules .. .. 203 tiuctuosa, Cyniatophoi'a 49, 135, 197, 206, 221, 301, 353 iiuviata, Camptogramma . . . . 305 Fodicantes . . . . . . . . 167 fontis, Boniolocha . . . . 249, 334 formicifoimis, Mgeiia (Sesia) . . 272 formosella, CEcophora . . . . 182 tranconica, Malaco&oma . . . . Ill fraternella, Lita . . . . . . 259 fraudatricula, Bryophila . . . . 181 fraxini, Catocala .. .. .. 228 frequentella, Scoparia ab. concinella . . . . . . 204 var. portlandica . . . . 204 fringsi hybr., Suierinthus . . . . 278 fritillura, Syrichthus . . 126, 283 var. caecus . . . . • . 126 fuciformis, Hemaris (Macroglossa) 112, 129, 130, 161. 162,163, 165, 215, 272, 278, 347 t'ugitivella, Teleia 110 fuliginaria, Parascotia (Boletobia) 3 fuliginosa, Spilosoma . . 27, 302 var. borealis . . • • ■ • 205 t'ulva, Tapinostola. . .. .. 205 ab. concolor .. .. .. 116 ab. neurica . . . . . . 116 ab. ochracea . . . . • • 116 ab. pallida . . . . . • 116 ab. punicea . . . . - • 116 ab. pygniina . . . . ■ • 116 fulvago, Citria (Xanthia) 83, 134, 167, 206, 300, 347 ab. flavescens . . . . . • 206 fulvalis, Pionaea . . . ■ . • 182 fulvata, Cidaria . . . • • • 201 fulvcsoens, Mompha . . • • o4S fumata, Acidalia . . . • • • 206 XVUl, SPECIAL INDEX. furcata (sordidata. elutata), Hydri- omena . . . . . . 300, furcatellus, Crambus furcula, Dicranura (Cerura) 137, 197,198, 250, 271, furva, Mamestra . . . . 190, furvata, Sciadion . . fusca, Pygiaaena . . fusca, Zelleria fuscantaria, Ennomos fuscipunctella, Coleophora . . fuscovenosa, Ptychopoda . . fuscus, Mimaeseoptilus gadessalis, Actaenia galactodactylus, Aciptilia . . galathea (galatea), Melanargia 24, 125,126, 142,144, 170, 171, 227, 229, 250, 255, 275, 270, 282, 283, 289, 291, 298, 299, 304, var. procida galiata, Melanippe . . 49, galii, Celerio (Deilephila) . . gamma, Phisia 50, 87, 134, 181, 275, 286, 300, 30] , geerella, Elasmion . . gelatella, Enyphantes Gelechiides . . gemina, Apamea ab. rufescens . . geminipuncta, Nonagria . . 28, gemmai'ia ( rhomboidaria) ,Boarmia ((/;. (et (■((/•.) peifumaria genistae, Hadena . . 109, 249, 273, Gentiles Genuinae Geometia Geometrae . . Geometridae. . Geometiides . . Geometriformes gerningana, Amphisa geryon, Adscita gilvago, Melliiiia . . ah. (et V((r.) suti'usa gilvaiia, Aspilutes . . glabraria, Cleora Glaeae glaveosa, Noctua ab. surt'usa (edda) glauca, Hadena glaucata (spinula), Cilix .. glaucicolella, Coleophora . . glaucinalis, Herculia (Pyralis) Glancopes glyphica, Euclidia . . Kis, Glyphipteiygides . . gnaphalii, Cucullia. . Gnophos (Sciadion) goante, Eiebia 125, 12G, 25(), 327, goedartella, Aijjyiesthia .. 347, gonostigma, Notolophns (Orgyia). . gorge, Erebia . . 120, 142, ab. erynnis . . . . ]2C, 308 49 301 20(5 168 328 259 102 182 199 256 182 285 306 332 352 278 345 168 168 259 117 346 134 203 284 167 167 188 168 199 206 168 345 257 300 ..187 .. 202 190, 219, 273 .. 167 304 149 305 301 260 347 167 202, . . 181, 105, 285, 269, 138, Kil, 228, 259 353 199 328 348 41 14(; 142 gothica, Graphiphora gothica, Taeniocampa ah. pallida (ih. rufa Gracilaria Grucilariidae Gracilariides Gracilariinae gracilis, Taeniocampa P.VGK. ..167 132, 164, 219 . . 186 . . 186 192 191 260 191 191, 191, 132, 219 164, 220, alj. hrunnea tib. rosea '///. (et ni)-.) rufescens. . graniinella, Canephora graniinis, Charaeas 49, 190, 256, gramniica, Eulepia. . j^raiiella, lirosis Graijhiphorae griseana, Eiipoecilia griseola, Lithosia . , . • 171, grossulariata. Abraxas (Spilote) 134, 168, 300, 303, 304, 305, 321, ab. lacticolor . . . . 322, griineri, Euchloe . . . . 32, gryphipennella, Coleophora guttea, Ornix guttifinitella, Cameraria . . Hamadryades hamula (binaria), Drepana (Platy- pteryxj .. ..167,250,301, hastata, Melanippe (Rheumajjtera) 168, haworthii, Celaena.. (■(()•. hibernica . . ab. lancea ab. tripuncta . . hecate, Brenthis (Argynnis) 86, 120, hector, Papilio heldreichii, Colias .. ..64, 65, Heliacae Heliconius . . Heliophilae . . Heliotheutes helle, Chrysophanus Hemaris (Macroglossa) hemerobiella, Coleophora . . Hemerophilae heparata (obliterata), Eupisteria 273, 301, 344, hepariella, Zelleria . . hepatica, Xylophasia . . 249, Hepioli hera(quadripunctaria),Callimoi'pha 2, 3, 169, 171, 181, 227, 253, ab. lutescens . . heracleana, Thaumatopoea Heraeae herbariata, Ptychopoda herculeana, Cnetiiocanipa. . Herculia hermanella, Aristotelia hermione, Satyrus 124, 125, 120, 169', 170, 282, 283, 293, 284 186 186 186 168 306 181 168 167 204 300 322 323 66 347 347 192 167 346 206 306 117 117 117 146 293 66 168 6 167 168 290 112 348 168 345 259 344 167 285 247 181 167 199 88 347 348 350 SPECIAL INDEX. iix. PAGE. Hespeiidae . . . . . . . . 170 Heterocera . . . . . . . . 181 heterodactyla (teucrii), Oxyptilus 82 Heteromorphae . . . . . . 107 hexadactyla, Eipidophora . . . . 168 hibernicella, Masonia . . . . 261 hiera, Pararge .. ..11,5'.), 333 hieracii (pluinifera) (atra), Psyche 57, 58 Hipocritae . . . . . . . . 167 hippocastanaiia, Pachycnemia . . 165 hippothoe, Chiysophanus 143, 14(;, 290, 326, 327, 328 car. eurybia 125, 126, 255, 292, 326 liiisutella, Sterrhopterix . . . . 261 hirtaria, Biston . . . . . . 302 liispida, Heliophobus a7^ argentea .. .. ..117 ah. obsoleta . . . . . . 117 ab. pallida . . . . . . 117 hispidaria, Nyssia 28, 56, 81, 82, 110, 129, 136 hodgkinsoni, Nepticula . . . . 261 honoiella, Pleurota. . .. .. 182 humiliata, Ptychopoda . . . . 199 humuli, Hepialus (Hepiolus) . . 167 hyale, Eurymus (Colias) 1, 24, 50, 06, 86, 120, 124, 126, 134, 170, 216, 222, 229, 254, 275, 283, 286, 290, 304,305, 313 Hybocampa (Notodonta) . . . . ^iOS hybridalis (noctuella), Nomophila (Stenopteryx) ..182,228,257, 32.S hybridus /i ?/?';-., Smerinthus 191, 277 Hydriae . . . . . . . . 168 Hylaeae . . . . . . . . KiS hvlas, Polyommatus 119, 125, 126, 170, 253, 283, 290, 332, 333, 354 far. nivescens . . . . 119, 121 Hyloicus (Sphinx) 248 Hymenopteroides . . . . . . 167 hyoscyamella, Gelechia . . . . 182 hyperanthus, Enodia 24, 126, 136, 170, 229, 256, 283, 289, 291, 298, 299, 306 hyperborea (alpina), I'achnobia • 149, 161, 353 Hyperconipae . . . . . . 167 Hyphantae . . . . . , . . 168 Hypogymnae . . . . . . 167 ianira, Epinephele vide jiirtina, E. ianthina, Triphaena . . 134, 300 icarus, Polyommatus 11, 12, 51, 58, 66. 121, 124, 133, 13C), 169, 170, 171, 216, 226, 2.>6, 275, 283, 290, 299, 300, 303, 304, 312, 313, 314, 326, 331, 333, 341, 315 car. arcuata . . . . . . 5^ ab. clara . . . . . . 113 jb. icarinu:; . . . . . . 126 ijo. ? melanotoxa . . . . 58 PAGE. ichneumonitormis, Aegeria . . 349 icteiicana, Spliaeloptera . . . . 345 ida, Epinephele .. 11,12,86,121 Idiae . . . . . . . . . . 16k ilia, ApatiUH 11, 60, 61, 142, 143 car. clytie . . . . . . 142 ilicifolia, Gastropacha . . 108, 277 ilicis, Thecla 11, 12, 72, 121, 228, 283 var. aesculi . . . . . . 332 car. cerri . . . . 282, 283 illustraria, Selenia vide tetralu- naria, S. imitariii, Acidalia . . . . . . 300 immaculata, Mimas cide tiliae, M. immundella, Trifurcula t'flr. squamatella .. .. 261 inimutata, Acidalia. . .. .. 206 iinperialis, Eaeles . . . . . . 101 impluviata (trifasciata) (autunina- lis), Hypsipetes 135, 273, 301, 305, 331, 357 inipudens (pudorina), Leucania .. 344 ab. ruiescens . . . . . . 116 impura, Leucania . . 132, 133, 134 ah. punctilinea . . . . 116 ab. punctina . . . . . . 116 inconspicuella, Solenobia . . var. triquetrella . . . . 261 var. wockii . . . . . . 261 incendaria, Sphecomorpha . . 167 incerta (instabilis), Taeniocampa 164, 219 ah. atra. . . . . . . . 186 ah. (et var.) caerulescens . . 186 ah. rufa. . . . . . . . 186 Incertae . . . . . . . . 168 incunaria, Gypsonoma . . . . 182 Indubidatae . . . . . . . . 168 ines, Melanargia . . . . 12, 72 infausta, Aglaope . . . . . . 181 ino, Bienthis 126, 281, 291, 331 inopella, Ptocheuusa . . . . 110 inornata, Leptomeris . . . . 200 inquinatellus, Crambus . . . . 182 instabilella, Cerostoma . . . . 182 instabilella, Lita . . . . 105, 259 institalis, Pionea .. .. .. ]82 inteifaunus hi/hr., Calasymbolus 277 intcrjecta, Triphaena 134, 285, 300, 353 interjectaria (fuscovenosa), Ptycho- poda 199 interrogationis, Plusia . . . . 20(5 inversa hijhr., Amorpha . . 191, 278 io, Hyperchiria . . . . . . 100 io, Vanessa 11, 23, 87, 120, 126, 132, 134, 136, 143, 164, 170, 216, 218, 227, 255, 283, 299, 303, 306, 331 iolas, Lycaena . . . . . . 60 iphioides, Coenonympha . . 87, 121 iphis, Coenonympha 143, 146, 256, 291 iris, Apatura (Potamis) 60, 61, 136, 142, 143, 167, 272, 283 ivregulaiif:., Dianthoecia . . 83, 353 SPECIAL INDEX. isabellae, Graellsia 86, 88, 89, 90, 120 isogrammaria, Eupithecia. . .. 841 Itarae 202 Ithysia (Nyssia) . . . . . - 3 jaeobaeae, Euchelia (Hipocrita) 85, 135, 107, 181, 221, janthina, Triphaena 134, 200, japonica, Luehdorfia japygia, Melanargia jasioneata, Eupithecia . . 50, jasins, Charaxes Jaspidae jo, Hamadryas jiu'tina, Epinephele 11, 118, 121, 120, 134, 130, 170, 171,220. 227, 250, 275, 283, 291, 298, 299, 313, 344, 345, var. hispulla . . . .12, 07, 301 300 225 121 203 11 107 107 354 121 kilmunella, Elachista . . . . 200 korbi, Albarracina .. .. 89, 181 kriiperi, Pieris . . . . 32, 00 laburnella, Cemiostoma . . lacertinaria (lacertula), Drepana 135, 250, lachesis, Melanargia 11, 72, 80, Lachneides . . . . . . 107, Lachneis lactearia, lodis 133, 135, 273, laounana, Sericoris.. lafauryana, Tortrix 1-album, Heliophila (Leucania) 2, lanceolana, Bactia . . ah. (et var.) nigrovittana lanestris, Lachneis (Eriogastpr) 81, 109, 122, 133, 100, 301, lapideUa, Lulha . . . . 71, lappella, Parasia lappona, Erebia . . 59, 14(), ah. polhix lapponaria, Nyssia . . lapponica, Nepticubi Larentia (Cidaiia) . . Larentiidae . . . . 0, 198, 200, Lares . . lariciata, Eupithecia laripennella, Coleophora . . 105, larissa, Melanargia. . .. 32, Lascivae lathonia (latona), Argynnis 11, 12. 00, 80, 120, 120, 109, 170. 229, 291, 283, lathoiiiana, Conchylis lavitelia, Lithocolletis var. irradiella lavaterae, Spilothvrus 125, I2(i, 227, Legitimat; leoniao In/hr.. Mimas Leiiioniades . . Leniures leporina, Acronvcta 135, 222, 301, 302, 300, 341, 348 301 12] 270 111 301 182 182 353 205 341 217 110 334 5!) 201 198 202 lOH 2iiS 34s 00 lOS 182 2(1(1 288 107 107 10« 344 PAGE. . 115 . 192 . 219 . 149 . 149 . 107 ah. semivirga . . Leucanthiza. . leucographa, Pachnobia ah. rufa . . ah. suffusa Leucomae leucophaearia, Hybernia 28, 50, 103, 110, 129, 273 Leueopteni (Cemiostoma) . . 102 Leucopterinae . . . . . . 192 leucostigma, Helotropha . . . . 285 levana, Araschnia . . 288, 290, 304 libatrix, Gonopteia. .134, 284, 300, 301 Libytheidae . . . . . . . . 0 lichenaria, Cleoni 28, 105. 219, 248, 273 liciienea, Epunda 50,82,101 lichenella, Solenobia . . . . 218 ligea, Erebia 124, 120, 2.55, 291, 326 Ligia 201 Ligiidae 201 lignella, Hvpochalcia . . . . 182 ligniperda,'Cossus .. 190, 200, 250 ligula (spadicea), Orrhodia 49, 50, 81 ligustri, Craniophora 49, 114, 190, 249 ah. nigra . . . . . . 114 ligustri, Sphinx 237, 274, 274, 278, 300, 342, 343 limacodes(testudo), Cochlidion 108, 272 limbaria (conspicuata), E'idonia .. 128 liniitata (chenopodiata) (mensu- raria), Ortholitha (Eubolia) 133, 135. 250, 300 ah. monodii . . . . . . 202 Limuades . . . . . . . . 167 limnalis, Elophila . . . . . . 168 limoniella, Goniodoma . . 200, 350 limosipenuella, Coleophora . . 109 liiiea, Adopaea (Thymelicus) 121, liuea, Coleophora . . linearia, Zonosonia. . lineola, Thymelicus ah. pallida lineolata (virgata), Mesotype lineolea, Coleophora literalis, Diasenria . . literosa, Miana . , . . 184, 299 109 301 113 275 109 257 285 lithargyria, Leucania 82, 184,^51, 299 ah. extralinea . . . . . . 115 ah. fulvescens . . . . . . 115 alt. marginata . . . . . . 110 (//'. pallida . . . . . . 115 LilhocoUetides 260 Litliocolletinae . . . . . . 191 Lithocolletis 191 lililiodactylus, (Edeniatophorus . . 285 lithoriza (areola), Xylocampa 104, 219 hthoxylea (lythoxylea), Xyloplia- sia (Xylena) . . 167, 299. 805 litloralis, Heliophila (Leucania) 188, 352 littorana. Sericoris.. .. .. 2S8 iitura, Anchocelis . . . . . . 134 var. (et ah.) ruia . . . . 187 liturata, Macaria . . . . 202, 273 SPECIAL INDEX. PAGE. lividaria, Nychiodes . . . . 202 livoinica, Phiyxus (Deilephila) 181, 278, 280, 348 lixella, Coleophora . . lobelia, Enicostoma lobulata (carpinata). loganella, Ornix loreyi. Leucania lota, Orthosia (lb, pallida ab. rufa . . ab. suffusa lonicerae, Anthrocera lozopeioides, Phalonia lubricipeda, Spilosoma lacens, Hydroecia . . lucernea, Agr(jtis . . rnr. (et ab.) renigera lucilla, Neptis lucina, Nenieobius 165, lueipara, Euplexia 49, Inctuosa, Acoutia . . lucnlella, Gelcchia . . Luffia luiia, Actias. . lunaria, Eutrapela . . lunaria, Selenia .. 182 .. 101) Lobophora 105, 219 ..260 ..353 206, 285, 346 ..187 ..187 .. 187 171, 181, 328 .. 182 80, 321, 352 .. 269 82, 190, 206 ..148 171, 282, 283 214, 290, 333 273, 285, 300 .. 229 ..347 ..170 ..101 .. 168 285, 301, 305 lunaris, Ophiodes (Ascalapha) 27, 168 lunigera, Agrotis .. ab. nigra ab. pallida ab. suffnsa lunosa, Anchocelis . . ab. bruimea ab. obsoleta lupulinus, Hepialus Inridata (exteisaria), luridata, Leptomeris lurideola, Lithosia . . lutarella (pygmaeola), Inteago, Luperina . . var. barrettii . . var. ticklini lutealis, Scoparia . . luteata, Asthena luteolata (crataegata). Rumia 133, liiteus, Malacosoraa (Lachneis) . . lutosa, Calamia ab. cannae ab. rufescens . . liitulenta, Epunda .. 50. 285, 286, ab. albidilinea . . ab. consiniilis . . lyeaon, Epinephele IIH, 121, 125, Lycaeaidae . . . . . . 170, 190 lycidas, Plebeius . . . . 60, 355 lychiiitis, Cnoullia . . . . . . 353 Lycophotia . . Lyonetia . . . . . . . . 192 Lyonetiidae . . . . . . . . 192 LyonetiideK . . . . . . . . 26 Lyonetiinao . . . . . . . . 192 147 ..147 ..147 ..147 50, 134, 309 -.187 .. 187 .. 218, 276 Tephrosia 273. 347 199 171, 248, 300 Lithosia 171, LSI ..118 .. 118 .. 285 .. 285. 334 305 111 116 116 302 187 2S6 126 Lythria (Botys) PAOB. ,. 199 Macaria (Semiothis) machaon, Paj)ilio (Princeps) 2, 12, 72, 87, 118, 120, 124, 126, 167, 170, 227, 254, 272, 283, 290, 304, 312, 332, ab, aurantiaca . . macilenta, Orthosia (Anchocelis) 50, 206, 346, ab. straminea . . Macroglossa (Hemaris) Macroglossum (Sesia) maculata (macularia), Venilia 49, 133, 206, 221, 273, maeniacella, Coleophora . . maeniata, Petiophora maera, Pararge 124, 126, 170, 226, 256, 283, 291, 313, 332, maggiella, LufHa maillardi (difflua), Crymodes var. assimilis . . malvae, Syi'ichthus (Urbanus) 11, 126, 133, 167, 272, 283, 312, malvarum, Spilothyrus Mancipia . . . . ' . . Manduca Manducae manto, Erebia . . 124, 126, margaritata, Metrocampa 105, marginaria (progemmaria), Hy her- nia 28, .50, 110, ab. (et far.) fuscata . . marginata, Lomaspilis 248, 300, mai'ginepunctata , Leptomeris maritima (ulvae), Senta 28, maritimella, Coleophora marloyi, Nisoniades matiivna, Lemonias maturna, Melitaea . . viir. wolfensbergeri matura (eytherea), Cerigo maura. Mania (Lemur) 134. 108, 346 134, 168. 251, medon, Polyommatus medesicaste, Tliais. . medusa, Erebia 142, 143, 146, megacephala. Ciispidia (Acronycta) '285, ab. nigra . . . . 103, ab. ochrea megaera, Pararge 11, 121, 126, 134, 136, 170,283,291, 299, 312, 313, 332, ab. alberti Melalophae . . rnelampus, Erebia 124, 125, 126, 253, 291, 326, melanopa, Anarta . . melanops, Nomiades melas, Erebia meleager, Polyommatus 11. 12, .59, 61, 142, 143, 202 341 118 349 187 112 341 110 168 333 217 117 335 170 167 129 167 291 273 273 203 301 199 353 105 67 167 143 61 299 300 11 312 218 302 115 115 351 60 167 327 138 312 146 283 SPECIAL INDEX. PAGE. Melitaefi .. .. 255, 281, 282 mensurai'ia (limitata), Eubolia 133, 135, 256, 300 menthastri, Spilosoma . . 49, 352 ah. ochracea . . . . . . 306 var. scotica . . . . . . 188 menyanthidis, Pharetra 84, 115, 161, 248, 302, 305, 306, 345 ab. obsoleta 115 i^ar. scotica 115 ah. snffusa 115 mercurella, Seoparia 83, 1182 mesomella, Lithosia 23 272 mespilella, Lithocolletis 260 meticulosa, Phlogopbora 132, 134', 300 metis hyhr., Amorpha 278 mi, Euclidia 133, 189, 301 miata, Cidaria 269, 302 micacea, Hydioecia nh. brunnea 117 ab. grisea 117 ab. lutea 117 (lb. rubida 117 milbauseri, Hyboeampa 307 milvipennis, Coleopbora 109 miniata, Calligenia. . 248, 300 ab. lutescens . . 114 minima, Cupido 146, 216, 250, 255, 275, 283, 290 var. alsoides . . 288, 332 minimellus, Nemotois 347 miniosa, Taeniocampa 164', 273 ab. pallida 186 ab. virgata 186 minutata, Eupithecia 345 Mirabiles 168 Miseliae 167 mitfordella, Masonia 261 mnemosyne, Parnassius 61, 66, mnestra, Erebia moldavica, Cledeobia molybdeola, Lithosia monacha, Psilura . . moneta, Plusia 146. 333 61, 327, 328 . . 182 .. 280 ..248 3, 166, 219, 244, 285, 306 moniliata, Sterrha . . . . . . 199 monilifera, Narvcia . . 218, 249 ab. atrella " 261 monodactylus, Pterophorus 171, 182 monoglvpha (polyodon),Xv]ophasia 117, 134, 285, 299,'302, 340, 351 (lb. aetbiops . . . . . . 117 (lb. brunnea montanata, Melanippe var. (et ab.) sbetlandic; montivagata, Calocalpe morio, Hipogymna.. moipbeus, Heteropterus diina) ab. obscura mncidaiia, Sciadion mueronella, Theristis ab. striata multistrigaria, Larentia .. 117 250, 306 .. 203 .. 201 .. 167 (Cara- 142 147 202 .. 204 109, 165 PAGE. ah. nubilata . . . . . . 203 mimda, Taeniocampa . . 164, 219 ab. pallida . . . . . . 186 ab. striata . . . . . . 186 mundana, Nudaria 137, 193, 248, 352 mundella, Lita . . . . . . 260 miiralis (glandifera), Bryophila 71, 170, 181, 220, 222 rar. impar . . . . . . 188 ab. (et var.) obscura . . . . 188 muralis. Seoparia . . . . . . 83 murina, Nudaria . . . . . . 181 musculana, Cacoecia var. musculinana . . . . 204 musculosa, Synia . . . . 108, 353 mutata, Acidalia . . . . . . 327 myopaeformis, iEgeria . . . . 348 mvricae, Arctomyscis (Acronycta) ' 28, 88, 115," 161, 218 myrmidone, Colias.. .. 144, 146 myrtilli, Anarta 135,269, 304, 306, 345 var. rufescens . . . . . . 188 Naclia Najades nana, Eupoecilia nanata, Eupithecia. . .. 306, napi, Pieris 120, 126, 133, 134, 136, 146, 170, 254, 283, 29!), 303, 312, ab. bryoniae var. fiavescens. . nebulosa, Aplecta . . . . 135, var. (et ab.) pallida ab. robsoni negleeta (castanea), Noctua nemorana, Simaethis nenapia. Neoplasia.. Nepticulides . . Nereides nerii, Daphnis . . . . 278, nei'ine, Erebia var. reichlini . . nervosa, Depressaria neurica, Nonagria . . ah. rosea neustria, Malacosoma (Bombyx Trichoda) 106, 133, 160, 167, 285, 272, (Lb. rosea hyhr. schaufussi nickerlii, Luperina.. nictitans, Hydroecia 117, 134, 248, 269, 285, ab. albicosta ab. obscura ab. pallida ab. rosea nigra, Clostera nigra, Epunda 50, 269, nigricans, Agrotis . . ab. fuscovariegata (lb. pallida ab. quadrata . . ah. rufa. . 271, 302, 346, 347, 134, 281 167 109 345 832 59 59 273 188 188 302 182 294 261 167 280 334 334 182 116 300 116 106 118 299 116 116 116 116 356 356 286 147 147 147 147 SPECIAL INDEX. PAGE. nigricellfi, Coleophora . . . . 347 nigrocincta, Polia . . . . 55, 353 nigrofasciaria (derivata), Anticlea ICio nimbella, Homoeosoma . . . . 182 var. saxicola . . . . . . '204 niobe, Argvnnis 120, 124, 126, 227, 255, 291, 326 var. eiis 66, 118, 125, 126, 334 nisana, Grapholitha . . . . 83 nobilis, Phareka vide riimicis, P. Noctuae . . . . 167, 186, 2(58 noetuella (hvbridalis), Nomophila 182, 228, 257, 328 Noctuides . . . . . . . . 114 Nola (Lycophotia) . . Nolidae 307 Nolides 114 nostradamus, Hesperia . . . . 67 notata, Macaria 171, 220, 250, 301, 340 notha, Brephos . . . . 55, 220 Notodonta (Hybocampa) . . . . 308 Notodontides . . . . . . 188 nubeculosa, Petasia 82, 104, 135 nuraerica, Erastria. . .. .. 181 nupta, Catocala 134, 241, 300, 301 ah. caerulescens . . . . 188 Nycteola . . . . . . . . 169 nymphaea, Catocala . . . . 181 nymphaealis, Hydrocampa . . 85 nymphaeata, Nymphula . . 182, 226 Nyssia (Ithysia) . . . . . . 3 obelisca, Agrotis . . . . 269, 280 var. grisea . . . . . . 147 I'ar. bastifera . . . . . . 147 ab. suffasa . . . . . . 148 oberthiiri hybr., Smerintbns . . 278 obfuscalis, Pyrausta . . . . 182 obfuscata, Dasydia.. .. .. 271 obliterata (hepavata), Eupisteria 273, 301, 344, 345 obsoleta, Leucania . . . . . . 285 obsoletaria, Ptychopoda . . . . 200 obscura, Agrotis . . . . 285, 286 obseurata, Sciadion . . . . 202 obtasella, Coleophoia . . . . 2(;0 occulta, Aplecta . . . . . . 302 ocellaris, Mellinia . . . . . . 3 ocellata, Melanthia.. 133, 300, 305 ocellata, Smerinthus 109, 136, 137, 163, 166, 191, 192, 227, 278, 300, ochracea, Gortyna . . . . 102, ochraceella,Mompha(Myi'niecozela) 17, oiihrata, Acidalia (Emmiltls) 200, ochreai'ia, Asthena . . ochrea, Coleophora . . oehrolenca, Eremobia (Hadena) 181, 250, oehsenheimeri, Anthrocera (Zy- gaena) 171, Ocnerostoma 320 285 348 256 133 347 285 353 192 octogesima (ocularis), Cymatophora 181, 249, 285, 340, 341, 353 octomaculana, Cnephasia . . . . 204 octomaculata (octomaculalis) , Ennychia . .171, 229, 333, 351 oculea, Apamea vide didyma, A. oeme, Erebia . . 142, 143, 146 (Enochrominae . . . . . . 199 Oinophila 192 oleracea, Hadena . . 49, 285, 300 Olethreutae . . . . . . . . 168 olivata, Larentia . . . . . . 328 oliviella, Dasycera (CEcophora) 182, 347 ononaria, Aplasta . . . . . . 199 00, Dicyela 286 opacella (atra), Acanthopsyche 57, 58 ophiogramma, Apamea . . . . 285 opima, Taeniocampa . . . . 164 ab. brunnea . . . . . . 186 ab. grisea . . . . . . 186 ab. unicolor . . . . . . 186 Opogena . . . . . . . . 192 oporana, Archips . . . . . . 168 Opostega 192 or, Cymatophora (Bombycia) 167, 249 var. scotica . . . . . . 188 orbifer, Syrichthus.. .. ..67 orbitnlns, Polyomraatus 61, 125, 126, 291 orbona (comes), Triphaena 132, 134, 181, 190, 285, .300 abs. consequa, cnrtisii, nigra, rufa, rnfescens. virgata . . . . 148 Oreades 167 Oreopsyche . . . . . . . . 57 Orgyia 41, 42, 43 orion, Moma . . . . . . 272 orion, Polyommatns 58, 216, 282, 287, 332 ornata. Acidalia (Craspedia) 171, 200, 304 ornatella, Phycis . . . . . . 256 ornithopns (rhizolitha), Xylina 50, 164, 346 Ornix 191 orobi, Cemiostoma . . . . . . 261 Ortholitha (Plerocyniia) . . . . 199 osteodaetyliis, Leioptilus 82, 182, 327 ostensackenelbu Leucanthiza . . 192 ostrina, Thalpochares . . . . 181 ostrinalis, I'yrausta . . . . 182 ostrinaria, Hyi-ia . . . . . . 200 ottomanus, Chrysophanus 32, 33, tiC) oxyacanthae, Miselia . . . . 167 (lb. capucina . . . . . . 188 I'achyes 168 padella, Hypononieuta . . . . 49 palaomon, Carterocephalns 130, 331, 333 palaeno, Colias 60, 61, 125, 126, 291 palealis, Spilode.s . . . . . . 170 pales, Brenthis 124, 126, 142, 143, 144, 291 var. isis . . . i 125, 126 speciaTj index. ab. 9 napaea . . pailens, Leucania (Heliophila) ll(i, 134, 1(37, 285, ah. areuata, ah. suffusa palliola, Chlamiphora palpina, Pterostoma 109, 110, 133, Palpitae paludis, Hydroecia . . . . 117, ab. brunnea ah. grisea ab. intermedia . . palumbaria, Eubolia . . 285, Palumbina . . palustiis, Hydrilla . . ah. iiisca ab. lutescens . . pamphilus, Coenonympha 11, 49, 126, 133, 134, 136, 170, 216, 226, 253, 256, 283, 291, 298, 299, 313. .331, 3.32, var. lyllus pandalis, Botys pandora, Dryas (Argynnis) 11, 12, 66, 72, 86, 120, pantaria. Abraxas (Spilote) 71, paphia, Dryas 24, 120, 124, 126, 136, 142, 167, 169, 170, 189, 253, 255, 283, 299, 303, 306, 313, 326, var. valezina61, 125, 126, 169, 170, 171, 303, papilionaria. Geometra (Terpne) 55, 105, 135, 168, Papiliones . . Papilionides . . Papilionoides paradoxa, Heterogynis Paraseotia . . pariana, Hemerophila paripennella, Coleophora parthenias, Brephos 55, 110, 165, 168, parthenie, Melitaea 120, 126, 282, 291, var. varia 124, 126, 141, 143, 144, 146, 326, pascuellus, Crambui? pasiphae, Epinephele 11, 12, 86, 87, pavonia, Saturnia 27, 28, 127, 133, 167, 278, 302, pectinut,aria(viridaria),Larentia251 pedaria (pilosaria), Phigalia28, 50, 56, 83, 110, 129, 136, pellionella, Ses peltigera, Ileliothis pendnlavia, Cyclophora (Zonosoma) 168, 249, penella, HeterogyniB ab. monacbaria penkleriana, GiapholUba . . penuaiia, Hiniera . . 133, 269, pentadaetyla, AciptiJia (Pterophor- 08) 168, AGF. 1 26 300 116 1J6 168 301 168 285 117 117 117 305 192 353 147 147 345 283 273 334 202 345 326 248 167 113 167 307 3 168 348 219 326 334 182 121 320 276 273 168 353 273 307 203 83 273 171 penziana, Cnephapia var. bellana var. colquhounana peregrina. Hadena . . Pericopidae . . perla, Bryophila 134, 181, 221, 285, 299, 304, perlellus, Crambus . . 171, 182, persicariae, Maniestra perspicillaria, Cloantha petraria, Panagra . . 133, 206, petrificata, Xylina vide socia X. Petrophorae . . phegea, Syntomis (Glaucopis) 167, 171, pheretes, Polyommatus 60, 125, Phibalapteryx phicomone, Colias 61, 124, 125, 126, 253, 254, 290, 291, 327, phlaeas, Cbrysophanus 11, 56, 60, 66, 71, 106, 121, 134. 136, 170, 171, 255, 275, 290, 298, 299, 303, 312, 313, 314, 328, 333, ab. caeruleopunctata . . var. eleus . . 66, 170, ab. purpureopunctata. . ab. schmidtii . . phoebe, Melitaea 11, 86, 118, 120, 126, 145, 169, 171, 216, 291. 326, var. cancasica . . var. occidentalis var. oceitaniea. . phlomidis, Syriehthus phragmitidis, Calamia ab. paDida ab. rufescens . . phrygialis, Botys . . . . 257, Phyllobrostidae Phyllobrostinae Pbyllobrostis PhyUoenistinae Phyllocnistis . . . . 71, Phyllonoryeteres picata, Cidaria pieeana, Tortrix pietaria, Aleucis . . 50, 105, 132, pictella, Argyritis . . Pierinae pigra, Clostera Pigrae pilleriana, CEneetra.. pinastri, Hyloieus (Sphinx) 71, 87, 181, 248, pinetellus (pinellus), Crambus 182, 347, pinguinalis, Aglossa piniaria, Bupalus (Fidonia) piniaria, Cbleuastes pinicoliina, Evetria.. piniperda, Panolis 87, 135, 164, 190, 219, pisi, Hadena . . . . 256, 204 204 353 307 348 257 285 353 273 168 353 126 198 334 351 59 333 60 60 334 66 12 126 67 285 116 116 827 192 192 192 192 192 168 248 288 183 260 316 135 168 288 278 349 110 273 168 205 273 285 SPECIAL IMDEX. PAGE. var. seotiea . . . . . . 188 pistaeina, Anchocelis .. 285, iJOO ab. biunnea . . . . . . 187 pityocanipa, Thaiiniatopoea (Cne- thoeampa) .. .. 71, ]S1 plagiata, Anaitis ISo, 221, 273, 800 plaiitaginella, Lita . . . . 13i), 2o0 plantaginis, Numeophila . . 20o, 327 ab. hospita . . . . 41), 20-") var. bospiton . . . . . . 49 Platypterices . . . . . . 167 plecta, Noctua . . 49, 134, 299 Pleiocymia (Ortholitha) . . . . 199 pluiiiavia, Selidosenia . . . . 202 var. (lib. ?) pyrenaearia . . 202 plnmbaria, Eubolia . . 28o, 305 plumifeia, Oreopsyche . . 57, 58 plumifera, Ptilocepbala . . . . 217 plumularia, Anthometra . . . . 202 Plusiae 168 plusiaria, Euchlioris (Thetidia) . . 199 Pluteliides 204 podaliiius, Papilio 72, 74, 120, 124, 226, 283, 312, 313, 350 var. feisthameli . . 11, 12 Poliae 167 politalis, Evergatis . . . . . . 182 politella, Bryotiopha . . . . 259 polychloros, Eugonia 23, 66, 106, 109, 132, 134, 136, 165, 170, 216, 218, 219, 255, 272, 281, 283, 299 polygonalis, Mecyna . . . . 182 polygramma, Thalpochares . . 181 polyrania. Nereis . . . . . . 167 polyodon, Xylophasia vide mono- glypha, X. polyxena, Thais . . . . . . 245 pomonaria, Ithysia. . .. .. 3 popularis, Heliophobus 284, 304, 346 populata, Cidaria . . . . . . 306 populeti, Taeniocampa . . 81, 219 ab. nigra . . . . . . 186 ab. obsoleta . . . . . . 186 populi, Amorpha (Snierinthns) 130, 136, 137, 163, 164, 167, 191, 192, 259, 278, 306, 320 ab. borkhauseni . . . . 354 ab. pallida 279 ah. subflava . . . . . . 279 ab. treniulae . . . . . . 354 populi, Limenitis (Najas) 61, 143, 167, 282, 283, 289, 290 var. treinulae . . . . . . 282 populi, Poecilocampa 23, 28, 133, 272 porata, Zonosoma (Ephvra) 23, 134, 273, 300 porcellus, Theretra (Choeroeampal 163, 165, 248, 259, 271, 272, 275, 278, 279, 3U0 portlandieella, Lita . . . . 26U Potamides . . . . . . . . 167 potatovia, CoBmotriche (Odonestis) 24, 132, 133, 274, 320 potentillae, Coleophora . . 260 poterii. Nepticula . . . . . . 261 praecocella, Argyres . . . . 219 prasina, Aplecla . . 49, 206, 249, 273 prasinana, Hylophila (Halias) 135, 272. 300, 347 pratellus, Crambus. . .. .. 182 prienri, Satyvus 70, 71, 88. S9, 119, 121 ? var. uhagoni . . . . 119 Principes . . . . . . . . 167 primulas (festiva), Noctua ah. caerulea . . . . . . 149 ab. grisea . . . . . . 149 var. thulei . . . . . . 149 proboscidalis, Hypena . . . . 257 procellata, Melanthia . . 133, 300 prodromana, Aniphisa . . . . 105 prodromaria, Aniphidasys ride stra- taria A. prodromaria, Pachys . . . . 168 profundana, Paedisca . . . . 270 promissa, Catocala 81, 138, 190, 273, 288 pronoe, Erebia var. pitho . . 124, 125, 126 pronuba, Triphaena 134, 190, 285, 300 «/>. caerulescens .. .. 148 propugnata (designata), Coremia 133, 134, 251 prosapiaria (fasciaria), Ellopia 105, 190, 273 proserpina, Oreas . . . . . . 167 Prosolopha . . . . . . . . 201 protea, Hadena aZ*. (etrar.) variegata. . .. 188 proto, Syrichthus (Hesperia) 12, 121 protodiee, Pieris .. .. .. 264 pruinata (cytisaria), Pseudoterpna 199, 273, 300 prunaria, Angerona . . 133, 321 ab. sordiata . . . . 80, 321 pruui, Thecla . . 2, 60, 331, 332 pseudobonibycella, Taleporia, vide tubulosa, T. Pseudopanthera . . . . . , 202 Pseudo pes . . . . . . . . 168 psendospretella, Borkhausenia (CEcophoia) 348 psi, Triaena (Acronyeta) 49, 135, 301 var. bidens . . . . . . 116 ah. bivirgae . . . . . . 115 ab. juncta . . . . . . 115 ab. rosea . . . . . . 115 ab. suffusa . . . . . . 115 ub. virga . . . . . . 115 Psychidae .. .. 216, 261, 248 Pterophorae . . . . . . . . 168 Pterophori . . . . . . . . 182 Pterophorides . . . . . . 204 I'tilodoiites . . . . . . . . 167 Ptychopoda 199 pudilninda, Dasychira 135, 167, 251, 272, 301 pulchella, Deiopeia. . . . . . 2 pulcbellata, Eupitbecia . . 306, 352 SPECIAL INDEX. PAGE. rar. hebudium , . , . . . 203 pulla, Epichnopteryx . . . . 21-) pulveraiiii, Numeria . . 135, 206 pulverosella, Neptieula . . . . 109 pulverulenta (ciuda), Taeniocampa 130, 164, 182 ab. haggarti . . ab. pallida (lb. rufa. . pumilata, Eupithecia punctaria, Zonosoma punctata, Naclia punctularia, Tephrosia punicealis, Pyrausta pura, Thalpochares purpura! is, Anthrocera (Zygaena) 80, 227, 280, 326, 327 purpuralis, Heliaca (Pyrausta) 49, 168, 170, 182, 227, 257 purpurascens, Anthrocera. purpurata, Arctia . . purpurella, Eriocrania purpurina, Antophila 182, 183, 186 ..186 ..186 .. 219 .. 273 ..281 . . 135, 301 .. 227 .. 181 353 282 261 168 pusaria, Cabera 134, 135, 300, 301 pusaria, Sphecodes.. .. .. 168 pustulata, Phorodesma . . . . 285 puta, Agrotis 106, 134, 222, 299 ah, nigra . . . . . . 148 putris, Axylia . . . . 134, 285 pygmaeolii (lutarella), Lithosia 171, ISl pyraliata, Cidaria . . . . 256, 306 Pyralidae 182 Pyralides 168, 203 pyralidiformis, Thyris . . . . 167 pyralina, Cosmia (Calynmiu) 342, 353 Pyralis . . . . ' . . . . 347 pyraniidea, Amphipyra (Pyrophyla) 134, 107, 300 pyrivorella, Lithocolletis . . . . 260 pyrophila (simulans), Agrotis . . 353 ah. latens 148 (th. sibirica . . . . . . 148 ab. suffusa . . . . . . 148 Pyrophylae . . . . • • . . 167 quadra, (Enistis .. .. 219,272 quadrifasciaria, Coremia 23, 206, 275 quadripunctaria (hera), Calli- niorpha 3, 169, 171, 181. 227, 253, 285 ab. lutescens . . . . . . 247 quadripunctata (cubicularis), Cara- drina 181 quercana (bicolorana), Hylophila (Pseudoips) 133, 138, 160, KW quercifolia, Eutricha 132, 133, 167, 274, 301, 304 quercinaria (angularia), Ennomos 82, 273 quercus, Lasiocanipa 56, 132, 133, 170, 183, 184, 189, 259, 270, 276, 277, 278, 281, 300, 301, 302, 320 var. callunae . . 183, 184, 277 var. Bicula 171 querciin, Zephyrus (Thecla) 50, 121, 134. 160, 189, 219, 228, 272, 299, 303 quinquella, Neptieula .. .. 261 rajella, Phyllonorycter rapae, Pieris 11, 66, 120, 126, 183, 134, 136, 146, 170, 226, 227, 254, 264, 283, 299, 303, 312, raptricula, ]5ryophila ravida, Agrotis reclusa, Clostera rectangulata, Eupithecia . . rectilinea, Hyppa . . . . 49, remutaria (reniutata), Acidalia . . repandalis, Botys . . repandata, Boarniia 56, 248, 302, var. nigra I'ar. sodorensiura resinea, Scoparia . . respersaria, Sciadion respirantana, Conchylis reticulata (saponariae), Neuronia 249, 284, reticulata, Cidaria . . retiella, Whittleia . . retinella, Argyresthia retusa, Tetliea (Plastenis) . . 83, ab. gracilis . . . . 83, revayana (undulanus), Sarro- thripus 272, ab. ramosana . . rliamni, Gonepteryx 11, 66, 86, 120, 126, 132, 134, 136, 137, 160, 170, 216, 218, 227,254, 272, 283, 290, 298, 299, rhenella, Nephopteryx Rheuniapterae rhizolitha (ornithnpus), Xylina 50, 164, rhododactylus, Cnemidophorus . . Ehodostrophia rhombella, Gelechia richardsoni, Meesia ridens, Cymatophora . . 105, (Asphalia) 165. 206, (lb. interrupta . . ripae, Agrotis (lb. brunnea ab. grisea Kipidophorae roboraria, Boarmia (Cymatophora) 28, 54, 168. 249, 273, roboris, Laeosopis . . rosa, Crenis . . rostralis, Hyjjena . . . . 134, (lb. unicolor roxburglii, Ephestia roxelana, Pararge . . . . 33, rubi, Callophrys (Thecla) 59, 66, 136, 274, 283, 290, 312, 332, 333, ub. immaculata rubi, Macrothvlacia (Bombvx) 27, 171, 269, 272, 168 319 181 353 56 273 206 273 182 352 203 203 248 202 182 285 108 138 347 134 187 274 288 331 344 168 346 182 200 348 261 272 188 148 148 168 347 121 316 300 188 204 66 351 59 350 SPECIAL INDEX. PAGE. rubi, Noctua. . 134, 171, 172, 344 ah. flava . . 171, 172, 173 ah. ochracea . . . . . . 172 ah. quadrata . . . . 172, 173 rubidata, Anticlea . . . . . . 341 rubiginata, Emmiltis . . . . 199 rnbiginea, Dasycampa 80, 104, 164 ab. unieolor . . . . . . 187 rubricollis, Gnophria 272, 300, 347 rubricosa, Pachnobia 105, 164, 305 ab. pallida . . . . . . 149 (tb. (et var.) rnfa . . . . 149 rufa, Coenobia . . . . . . 353 ab. pallescens . . . . . . 116 rufaria (rufata), Ptvchopoda (Chesias) . . . .109, 200, 228, 341 rufella, Pterothrix 181 rufina, Anchocelis . . . . . . 50 rumicis, Pharetra (Acronvcta) 49, 84, 285 ab. euphrasiae . . . . . . 115 ab. lugubris . . . . . . 84 ab. nobilis . . . . . . 84 ab. salieis . . . . 84, 115 rumina, Thais .. .. .. 11 rupicapraria, Hybernia ..28,50, 131 rurea, Xylophasia . . 49, 285, 302, 340 ah. argentea . . . . . . 117 ab. combiista . . . . . . 302 ab. flavorufa . . . . . . 117 ab. nigro-rubida . . . . 117 russata (trnncata), Cidaria . . 351 russnla, Nemeophila (Euthemonia) 160, 181, 189, 249, 272, 327, 352 rusticata, Acidalia . . . . . . 345 rusticata, Cosmorhoe . . . . 200 var. mustelata. . .. .. 200 Rustici 167 sacraria, Ehodometra 200 sagittata (sagitta) var., Agrotis . . 147 Saliae 168 salicalis, Salia 168 salicata, Larentia . . 49', 305 salinella, Coleophoia 260 salopiella, Eriocrania 261 sambucaria (sambucata), Uiapteiyx (Lars) .. .. 168, 133, 206 sanguinalis, Pyrausta 182 sanguinaria, Lythria (Botys) 200 sao, Syrichthus (Hesperia) 121 12(;, 312, 327 var. enerate 12 saponariae (reticulata), Neuronia 249 284, 285 sai"pedon, Anthrocera 181 sarpedon, Papilio . . 225 satellitia, Scopelosoma 132, 164, 269, 285 satura (porphyrea), Hadena 353 satnratella, Coleopbora 260 satyrata, Eupitbeeia 206 var. callunaria. . 203 var. cnr/.oni 203 satyrion, Coenonympha . . 291, 327 PAGE. saucia, Peridroma (Agrotis) 50, 134, 300 sauciana, Penthina. . var. staintoniana . . . . 205 saxonellus, Crambus . . . . 182 scabiodactylus, Mimaeseoptilus . . 82 scabriuscula (pinastii), Dipterygia 272 schalleriana, Peronea ah. (et var.) perplexana . . 204 scliaufussi hi/hr., Malacosoma . . 107 schlaegeriella, Pleurota . . . . 182 sehrankiana, Titania . . . . 218 Sciadion 168, 199 scirpi, Elachista 260 seopariella, Depressaria . . . . 110 scopoliana, Catoptria car. parvulana. . .. .. 205 scotana, Leptogramma 56. 269, 349 scotica, Fumea . . . . . . 261 scrivella, Gelechia . . . . . . 182 scutulata (dimidiata), Acidalia 309, 350 Scythris 348 sebrus, Cupido 58, 59, 125, 126, 227 secalis, Hadena . . . . . . 181 segetis (segetum), Agrotis 134, 167, 285, 300 selasellus, Crambus . . . . 256 selene, Brenthis 49, 136, 169, 170, 171, 249, 299, 303, 331, 341 sellana, Penthina . . . . . . 171 semele, Satvrus 11, 66, 86, 89, 119, 121, 126, 134, 136, 170, 222, 256, 275, 291, 299, 303, 304 var. aristaeus . . . . . . 282 semiargus, Nomiades 11, 12, 32, 66, 125, 126, 216, 255, 283, 290, 291, 326, 332, 333 ruir. blachieri . . . . 332, 333 var. helena . . . . 32, 66 var. parnassia . . . . 32, 66 semideeandrella, Lita . . . . 2.59 semifusca, Argyresthia . . . . 259 SemigeomeU'ae . . . . . . 168 semipurpurella, Eriocrania . . 109 seniirubella, Salebria . . . . 182 serairufa, Ephestia . . .. .. 203 Semiothisa (Macaria) . . . . 202 senex, Nudaria . . . . . . 285 sepiaria, Tephrosia. . .. .. 202 sepium, Bacotia . . . . 229, 249 serella, Xepticula . . . . . . 261 sericealis, Rivula . . . . . . 285 sericeata, Sterrha . . . . . . 199 serrularia, Phaselia . . . . 201 servella, Xystophora . . . . 349 Sesia (.Egeria) (Macroglossum) 3, 88, 167 Setes 168 Sibylla, Limenitis 124, 126, 189, 272, 283, 290, 312, 313, 331, 332, 345 sicanaria, Rhodostrophia . . . . 200 signatella, Symmoca . . . . 182 similis (auriflua), Porthesia 134, 167, 300, 340, 344, 345 siraulans (pyrophila), Agrotis . . 353 ab. latens 148 SPECIAL INDEX. PAOK. ab, sibirica . . . . . . 148 (tb. suft'u&a . . . . . . 148 simulata, Thera . . . . . . '2o!) sinapis, Leptidia 11, 12, 59, 87, 120, 126, 136, 169, 170, 214. 216, 227, 229, 254, 283, 290, 312, 313, 326, 332, 333 ab. diniensis . . . . . . 331 ah. subgrisea , . . . . . 59 sinuata, Anticlea .. 250,271,350 sinuella, Homoeosonia . . 171, 182 smaragdaria, Phorodesma (IjU- ehloria) 192, 199 ab. alinea . . . . . . 204 ah. obsoleta . . . . • ■ 204 ab. unilinea . . . . . . 204 sobrina, Noctua .. 1(16,271, 286 ah. sulfusa . . . . . . 149 sobrinata, Eupitheeia . . 83, 190 var. stevensata . . - - 203 Bocia, Xylina . . . . 164, 346 ab. (et var.) rufescens . . 188 Bociata (subtristata), Melanippe . . var. obscurata . . . . . . 203 sociella, Aphomia . . . . . . 347 Solenobia 217 solldaginis, Litbomia var. suffusa . . . . . . 188 Eordida, Mainestra . . ah. ochraeea . . . . . . 117 sordidata, Hydriomena vide fnr- cata, H. sorhagenella, Phyllocnistis 71, 182 sororcula, Lithosia . . . . . . 272 spadicea, Oiihodia vide ligula, 0. sparganii, Nonagria . . 108, 138 sparsata, Collix . . . . . . 273 spartiata, Chesias . . . . 109, 251 spectrum, Apopestes (Spintherops) 181 Sphecodae . . . . . . . . 168 Sphecomorphae . . . . . . 167 Sphinges . . . . . . . . 167 Sphingidae 129 Sphingides 192, 278 Sphingoides . . . . . . . . 167 Sphinx .. .. .. ..101 sphinx (cassinea), Asteroscopus 23, 80 spilleil, Tieris . . . . . . 316 Spilotae 168 Spilothyrns (Cai'charodus) spini, Thecla 72, 86, 121, 228, 283 ab. lyncaeus . . . . 282, 283 spinula (glancata), Cilix . . . . 301 splendida, Oigyia . . 41, 42, 45, 181 splendidella, Dioryctria . . . . 181 spoliatricula, Jaspidia . . . . 167 sponsa, Catocala (Blepharuni) 138, 168, 273 squamosella, Coleophora . . . . 260 Rtabilis, Taeniocanii)a 132. 164, 219 stagnah.s, Hydrocanipa . . . . 226 staiutoni, Bankesia. . .. .. 261 kitatices, Adscita (Procris, Chiyeaor) 167, 206, 257 fAQE. •statilinus, Satyrus . . . . 89, 120 .stellatarum, Macroglossum (Bom- bvlia, Sesia)87, 130. 136, 137, 163, 164, 167, 193, 226, 275, 279, 300 sticticalLs, Pyialis . . . . . . 170 stigmatica irhomboidea), Noctua 206, 285 straminea, Leucania 23, 285, 353 «/>. intermedia. . .. .. 116 (lb. nigrostriata . . . . 116 ah. ob.'^oleta . . . . . . 116 ah. rulolinea . . . . . . 116 straminata, Acidalia . . . . 344 stralaria (prodromaria), Amphy- dasvs 28, 50, 82, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 129, 165, 273 striana, Orthotaenia . . . . 257 strictaria, Phaselia . . . . . . 201 strigata (thymiaria), Hemithea 133, 227, 246, 248, 300 strigilis, Miana . . 134, 273, 300 ah. aethiops . . . . . . 117 ab. latruncula . . . . . . 117 ab. unieolor . . . . . . 117 strigillaria, Aspilates 273, 351, 352 strigula (porphyrea), Lycophotia (Agrolis) 272, 345 var. suffusa . . . . . . 148 strigula, Nola . . . . . . 50 aJ). raonaehalis . . . . 114 stygne, Erebia . . 60, 253, 327, 355 suaedella, Lita . . . . 139, 259 subapicella, Nepticula . . . - 261 subarcuana, Phoxopteryx . . . . 205 subbaumanniana, Conchylis . . 205 sublimaculella, Nepticula . . . . 347 wublustris, Xylophasia (Hadena) 181, 344 ab. pallida 117 subnotata, Eupitheeia . . . . 201 subrosea, Agrotis . . . . 108, 148 var. subcaerulea . . . . 148 subroseana, Eupoecilia . . . . 204 subsequa, Triphaena . . 190, 353 subsaturata, Ptychopoda . . . . 199 sudetica, Scoparia . . '. . . . 327 suffusa, Peridroma ride ypsilon, P. suii'usellu, Phyllocnistis . . . . 71 sulphurea, Erotyla . . . . . . 168 suppandalis, Metasia . . . . 182 suspecta, Dyschorista . . . . 302 ab. nigrescens . . . . . . 187 ah. rufa . . . . . . 187 syllius, Melanargia.. ..12,72, 121 sylvanus, Augiades (Pamphila) ■ (Hesperia) 11, 67, 121, 126, 135. 170, 206, 227, 283, 291, 299, 303 sylvata, Aliraxas (Spilote) 49, 249, 3.30, 341, 352 ah. obseura . . . . . . 204 ab. suffusa . . . . . . 204 sylvaticella, Coleophora . . . . 260 sylvaticolella, Coleophora . . . . 260 sylvelluB (adipellus), Crambus 256, 280 SPECIAL INDEX. PAGE. symphita, Coenonympha . . . . 1 42 var. typhonides 142, 143, 146 Synopsia . . . . . . . . 201 syringaria, Pericallia . . 285, 301 laeniata, Emmelesia tages, Nisoiiiades (Thanans) 12, 24, 67. 124, 126, 133, 135. 170, 283, 2'Jl, 312. 332, v pteia, Platycleis bvaueii, Isolabis brevipenne, Bhadinotatum brunneipennis, Spongiphora- bruimeri, Aemodogi-yilus . . biittnevi, Karschiella caeca, Anisolabis Calamus cameiunensls, Karschiella Carcinophora ceylouicit, Apteiygida Chaetospania Chelidura Chelisoches . . cinereus, Thamnotrizon . . circulata, Apterygida coriacea, Anechuia.. corticina, Sphingolabis *Cuililla Cylindrogaster decorata, Stylopyga Deruiaptera . . Diandria Diplatys doiuesticus, Gryllus dubia, Cosmiella edax, Gelastorihinus edentu'a, Pseudochelidura Eudennaptera Euplecopteia exoleta, Panchlora. . . Havicollis, Sparattina l-'orcipula l'"()iticula furcifera, Bphingolabis gansuicus, Gymnaeta Gelastorrhiiuis germanica, Phyllodromia . . Glyphoclonus Gonolabis graeca, Isolabella . . granulafus. Tctfix . . PAGE. PAOB. .. 97 Gryllotalpa . . 3^29 .. 157 Gryllus 329 .. 158 97, 98 hawaiiensis, Sphingolabis. 158 97, ]58 Hemimerus . . 195 .. 280 hugeli, AUodahlia .. 158 .. 158 huseiuae Sphingolabis 158 .. -248 Hyalopteryx. . 41 .. 328 jagori, Agterygida . . 97 .. 248 jagori, Pterygida . . 158 .. 243 japonica, Apterygida 97 .. 230 .. 329 Kakerlac . 328, 329 .. 157 kuhlgatzi, Gonolabina 159 .. 158 .. 97 Labia 140 .. 158 Labidura 97 .. 243 *Leucophaea 328 .. 159 Locusta . 139 .. 40 liiteipenuis, Apterygida 158 .. 195 . . 248 Machaeridia. . 41 140, 157 mackinderi, SphUigolabis . 158 macropyga, Anechura 158 .. 84 macuilatus, Gomphocerus . 243 .. 41 maritima, Anisolabis 27 .. 157 Mecomera . . 6 .. 97 media, Apterygida . . 158 . . 98 meridionalis. Parattettix . 231 .. 97 Metaleptea . . 41, 139 . . 9C) Metalliea, Anechura 97, 98 .. 97 Moiiandria . . 140 .. 243 nmtica, Chelidurella 157 .. 158 mutiea, Magrettia . . 248 .. 158 muticus, Gryllus . . 329 .. 158 .. 329 *necydaloides, Phasma 329 . . 97 Neolobophora .90, 97, 140 Nesogasler . . 157 .. 295 Nesogastrella 157 140, 328 uigrifrons, Agroecia 2tJ9 .. 140 (IT riivea, Panchlora 328 .. 13G Odontomelus 41 .. 1.58 Opisthocosmia ' 97, 98 onentalis. Kakerlac . 328 329 .. 40 ornatus, Tettix . 230 232 .. ].58 orsinii, Pseudochelidura . 158 140, 15C) Oxyolena 41 . . 295 I'ax'hytylus . . 139 Panchlora 328 . . l.")8 Piiradeiniaptera . 140 150 . . 97 parallulus, Steaobothorus . 243 97, OS I'aratettigidae 329 .. 158 Paratettix . . 329 Periplaneta . . 323 .. 248 per.sica, Magrettia . . 248 .. 40 Phasgonuridae 329 .. 329 phthisicum, Pliasma 329 .. 41 Phyllodromia 329 . . 97 Platylabia . . 97 , 98 .. 159 Psalis 97 .. 230 Pvragra 96 SPECIAL PAGE. pyrenaica, Chelidura 157 rebus, Cosmiella 158 religosa, Mantis 329 Khadinotatum ' 40 41 riparia, Labidura . . 98 346 sansibarica, Sphingolabis . 158 scabriuscula, Anechura 158 setulosa, Sparattina 158 silana, Forlicula 97 sinuata, Pseudochelidura . 158 sinuatus, Tylotettix 230 Sparatta '. 97, 98 *Steleopyga . . 329 *Stylopyga 329 surinamensis, Blatta . 328, 329 sylvestris, Goiiolabis 84 taeniata, Apterygida . 158, 195 Tagalina 97 tatarica, Locusta 329 Tettigidae . . 230 Tettigonij 329 *Tettix '. 139, 329 *Tetrix 329 togoensi. Ctenisolabis 159 tomis Fojficula 57 triangularis, Tettix.. .' 231, 232 *Truyalip 41, 239 Truxalis 41, 139 usambarana, Leptisolabis . 159 vara, Pseudochelidura 158 viridissima, Tettigonia 329 viridulus, Stenobothrus 243 vittipes, Agroecia . . . 243, 209 INDEX. pa<;e. zarudnyi, Magrettia 24H PSEUDONEUROPTERA flavidus, Caecilius . . 37 formicaria, Atropos . . 37 Hemerobius . . 37 SIPHONAPTERA. americana, Hystiichopsylla 63 dippiei, Hystrichopsylla . . 63 gallinae, Ceratophyllus garei, Ceratophyllus grandis, Typhlopsylla Pulex. . ursi, Pulex . . TERMITES. flavipes, Termes THYSANURA. albina, Beckia Beckia cincta, Orchesella . . TRICHOPTERA. bipunctatus, Limnophilus . . concentricus, Stenophylax .. 280 .. 280 62, 163 .. 62 62, 63 .. 235 .. 40 .. 69 .. 40 .. 303 .. 303 AND JOUjRNAL, OF VARIATION. Vol. XIV. No. 1. January 15th, 1902. Retrospect of a Lepidopterlst for the Year 1901." By LOUIS B. PEOUT, F.E.S. As happens almost every year, unless it be quite phenomenally productive or the reverse, one hears very varied reports from different sources and for different parts of the season as to the general abun- dance of insect life ; but on the whole it appears to have been above the average, and the number of records of the occurrence of species of exceptional interest is by no means a meagre one. Abnormally mild winters have become quite normal of late — if I may thus express myself— and that of 1900-1901 may be said to have been no exception, though perhaps it gave us a little more of seasonable cold than some of its immediate predecessors. The earliest spring Geometers were out on New Year's day, indeed, I believe one or two of them did not even wait for the New Year. Notwithstanding the supposed adverse influences of mild winters on hybernating larvae in general, I cannot help believing that they are really in some way suited to some of our casual immigrants, and that to them is to be attributed the regular annual occurrence, of late, of some of our erstwhile " rarities." I am aware that spells of awakening at unseasonable times are likely to be injurious to true hybernators, but the case may well be different with some of the southern species which hardly hybernate at all in the strict meaning of the word. Dr. Corbett remarks {Ent. Kecord, xiii., p. 278) that the frequency of larvfe of Manduca atrojws about Don- caster for three consecutive years (and the same might have been written of many other northerly localities) suggests that the species would appear to have maintained its existence there " without artificial forcing." Then, again, we have Phh'(/i't/iontius amrolndi, which has become strikingly abundant during the same period, while the larva, previously so rarely recorded in this country, has been found freely in many places. The immigration, too, of Eiiri/nnis hyale seems to have left some definite traces, as several specimens bearing the appear- ance of being "British born" were met with in the early summer of the present year, some of them being in inland localities, which the species reached in 1900 — e.(i., Brackley, Northants {Ent. liccord, xiii., p. 249). The allied F!. croceits (ednsa) has not been particularly con- spicuous this season ; some of our provincial entomologists are still a good deal puzzled by the erratic appearance of this species in different seasons, being evidently unaware of its migratory habits and of the * Read before the City of London Entomological and Natural History Society, December 17th, 1901. 2 THE ENTOMOLOfilST S RECORD. difficulty it has in maintaining itself with us ; thus a recent writer in the Entomolnijht cn.nnot find even a " probable explanation " of the remarkable fact that in a locality where he found E. crmrttfi in abun- dance in 1900 he failed to see one in 1901, and naively adds that "this is all the more remarkable as the lucerne field had not been ploughed up or disturbed in any way, there being a fair number of blossoms still in the field, which was being grazed by sheep." I venture to think that if our two species of EHnjmns had no greater difficulty to contend with than that of food-supply we should have them with us in plenty every year. Another immigrant which has appeared some- what freely this year is Pontia dapUdice, which is recorded from Dover, Eastbourne, Brighton, and perhaps elsewhere. Several Eurancssa antiojia have likewise been met with in different places. After the mild weather of the late autumn and winter, we were favoured with the usual quantum of cold weather in the spring, and most of the reports speak of the May insects as late in appearing, but the season soon regained itsequihbrium, and at Whitsuntide the insects were mostly well up to date, although during the whole season the dates were somewhat perplexing and difficult to follow, some species being certainly late in appearing, others as certainly early. Of true British butterflies, one is glad to learn that in spite of the dreaded " over-collecting," some of the most local have been met with in undiminished, if not in increased, abundance this year ; I need only mention Lijcaena arion and TJieda prunl. I have not heard that the immigrant Papilio nmchaon of 1900 have been able to breed in the country, and am afraid this interesting species must still be regarded as confined to the fens and broads. Apo>ia cratac(ii,\;h\(i\\ we thought we had almost lost in this country, seems to be gaining ground, having occurred rather freely in its old locality between Canterbury and Heme Bay, as well as at Dover. Much uncertainty prevails as to the cause of the decadence, from time to time, of this and many other species. Among the other branches of the Lepidoptera it may be of interest to comment upon a few of the most noteworthy captures. A few Choerocatnpa celerin should no doubt be considered among the class of immigrants, though a friend of mine has reliable information of the finding of larvse this year, and it is evidently possible for the insect to maintain itself here for a single generation, during the summer. Deiopcia pulchella probably falls under the same category ; at any rate, the capture of three this season by Mr. Ernest Warne in the same locality (near Earlsfield) may suggest, as the captor thinks, that they really bred there, though one cannot seriously claim this species as British. Of other casual visitors during the season, I can mention two which I have myself had the pleasure of being called upon to determine for their captors. One of these is the specimen of Hcliu- phila [Leucania] l-album, taken at Sandown by our valued Secretary, Mr. S. J. Bell, and already exhibited at one of these meetings. The other is a fine and strongly-marked Luperina dumerilii, captured by Mr. H. Douglas Stockwell on September 21st, on a gas-lamp in Dover, which he is kindly permitting me to exhibit this evening. The month of September was very productive in rare Noctuids, some species Avhich used to be of great rarity, such as Helinplnla vitclUna, Laphminia exir/ua, &c., appearing in considerable numbers in South Devon, and also occurring elsewhere on our south coast. According to recent in- RETROSPECT OF A LEPIDOPTERIST FOR THE YEAR 1901. 3 formation it seems probable that the former, at least, is really indi- genous in the district named, thongh its comparative abundance during the last two or three years is probably attributable to phenomenally favourable atmospheric conditions ; the same or similar causes have contributed to the increase of the once rare Heliophila alhijnmrta and Caradrina amhujua, though the reports of the present season appear to indicate that they are already on the wane. Probably, however, C aiiibii/na was never so rare as it was reputed to be ; at least, there is some ground for believing that it was formerly somewhat overlooked. Of recent importations (apparently) which have successfully established themselves, two or three deserve mention. CalUmorpha hem — or, as we shall unfortunately henceforth have to call it, C. quad- ripnnctaria, Poda — is still spreading in Devonshire, and there seems now a good chance of getting a series almost anywhere between Dawlish and Exeter, and perhaps, also, in other parts of the county. Plima moneta is also extending its range in various directions, and one or two of us have had the pleasure of welcoming it to our suburban gardens. Whether IthtjKia {Xi/asia) lapponaria ought to be referred to under this heading, and if so, how its importation came about, I do not know ; it is, of course, possible that it has been very much over- looked. At any rate, it is interesting to learn {Entom., xxxiv,, p. 255) that Mr. Cockayne, of Sheffield, has found out how to work for its larvffi in Perthshire, thus following up the success which Mr. W. M. Christy achieved a few years ago. The insect is sometimes re- garded as a boreal variety or race (or " Darwinian species ") of the I. jioiiinuaria of central and soi\thern Europe, but I am not in a position to express any critical opinion on the subject. There are a few species which w^e know to be genuinely British, and a few others which we think may probably be so, which yet con- tinue exceedingly rare in collections, owing in part to our ignorance of their habits, but perhaps also, in part, to the number of their enemies in this country, or to some other unfavourable circumstances, climatic or topographical, Avhich form more or less effectual checks to their increase in the " struggle for existence," while, at the same time, not so potent as to prevent their continuing with us, however pre- cariously. Entomologists are always pleased to meet with these, and they are often considered as of sufficient interest to be worth recording in the magazines. I notice that Xyloinines compidllaris is again re- corded this season from a few west-country localities, such as Taunton, Tewkesbury, &c. ; I believe the four counties of Herefordshire, Wor- cestershire, Gloucestershire, and Somerset would cover practically the entire ascertained range of this local moth in the British Isles, although Barrett adds that there are one or two records for Kent, Surrey, Suflblk, and South Wales. Apparently, still rarer species with us are Mcllinia ocellaiis, of which our member, Mr. Burrows, has taken and shown us a specimen ; Sesia (Aet/ena) andrem/oniiix, taken by Mr. Huggins at Gravesend on July 17th ; and Parascotia {Bole- tnhia) fidif/inaria, captured by my friend Mr. E. W\ Bobbins, at Walthamstow, on July 29th. Probably we have still a great deal to learn concerning the habits of these three species ; possibly, also, we do not show sufficient zeal in examining " the old rotten woodwork in the cellars and other structures along the banks of the Thames " to secure good series of the last-named, these being the favourite haunts 4 THE ENTOMOLOGIST S RECORD. of the fungus-feeding larvae of this interesting species. Mr. Robbins' specimen, however, was taken out-of-doors, flitting round a sugared post in the evening ; and on the continent I believe its occurrence in the open is quite usual. Is this really another migrant, introduced from time to time by shipping, and only able to thrive when protected from our climate within walls, just as we can easily breed many con- tinental species in our houses which fail to thrive when planted out ? Turning now to the writings of the present year, I can mention only a few of the more prominent, or of those which happen to have come more particularly under my own notice. A good deal of the most important work is done under the auspices of the entomological and natural history societies, or through the medium of the periodicals, and I would urge our members to support such organisations and publications to the utmost of their ability. Especially it seems desirable that every entomologist who takes any deep interest in the progress of the science should unite himself to the " Entomological Society of London," as it is very inappropriately called, seeing that it is essentially a national, and not a local society. It is at present in a flourishing condition financially, but with a larger income it could still further increase its sphere of operations ; besides, there is room for a considerable influx of new life, both in the direction of biological research and in that of distinctively British entomology (faunistic, &c.) ; at present a large part of the annual volume of Tramactions is devoted to very necessary, but very uninteresting descriptions of new species, and this kind of work needs supplementing (not supplanting) by a great deal more of scientific work, for which at present it would be difticult to find room in its pages. Apart from papers which are essentially descriptive or enumerative, one finds in the volume for 1901 (so far as yet published), some very interesting " Observations on some Species of Oreina," by Mr. Champion and Dr. Chapman, throwing some valuable light on the early stages, especially in regard to the viviparity of most of the species ; some notes by Mr. Elwes on Mrs. Nicholl's " Catalogue of Butterflies met with in the Lebanon" ; a welcome paper on " Cases of Protective Eesemblance, Mimicry, &c., in the British Coleoptera," by Mr. Donisthorpe, which reminds us that we lepidopterists can claim no monopoly in dealing Avith this very important branch of study, although we remember with pride that our favourite Order furnished nearly all the original material for it ; and some valuable anatomical notes on Osinia, by the Kev. F. D. Morice, which sufiice to raise his paper above the level of the ordinary descriptive ones. I must not omit to mention that one of our secre- taries, Mr. W. J. Kaye, has contributed an important faunistic paper on the hitherto totally neglected "Lepidoptera-Heterocera of Trinidad," and we are looking forward to other valuable contributions, on those of British Guiana, from the same pen. Our own Society and our sister Society across the Thames (the South London Entomological and Natural History Society) have each published a creditable volume of Transactions and Proceedinns during the year, the result of our work during 1900. I need not remind you of the contents of our owai volume, but I must spare a word of praise for that of our South London friends, which seems to reach the high level attained in 1899, and is much in advance, scientifically, of most of its predecessors in the series ; our inde- EETROSPECT OF A LEPIDOPTERIST FOR THE YEAR 1901. 0 fatigable friend Dr. Chapman is again to the fore in the volume in question, having contributed a paper "On some Wing-structures in Lepidoptera." The Kntnmol<)(jlst'>i Record opened the year (and century) with a special " Century Number," which, indeed, overflowed its banks and inundated the greater part of the February number, thus occupying altogether nearly 80 closely-printed pages. Naturally, the articles — which were designed to survey, as far as possible, the entomological progress of the Nineteenth Century — are not all equal in amplitude or in merit, but, nevertheless, they form a very valuable resume, which will often be consulted when the present century is older, and which — -if one may venture to prophesy so far ahead — will be of still greater service when the time comes for the next century review. I cannot refrain from quoting the conclusion of Mr. Tutt's prefatory note to the series, so pregnant is it with suggestions which we should all do well to lay to heart. He points out that the failing points of scientific progress are : " (1) An accumulation of wasted effort in collecting material. (2) Want of initiative in striking out new lines of work. (8) Want of perseverance in following up certain definite lines of experiment and observation. (4) Ignorance of work already done. (5) Inability to recognise the requirements of modern science in methods of work." And he adds: "These are so self-evident that there is no need to waste space in discussing them, and one can only look forward to a time when the conditions of modern life, which are all in favour just now of the sciences which are strictly utilitarian, shall not act against the true scientific enquirer, but put him in the same position for real scientific work, as that in which they at present place his more fortunate brethren, the students of chemistry and physics." I need hardly comment on this extract ; but I am optimistic enough to believe that the real value of entomology in its modern scientific aspects, and the bearing of these aspects upon the all- important science of biology, cannot much longer remain unrealised, but that we shall soon find ourselves much more favourably placed than is now the ca?e for the pursuit of our studies. I must call atten- tion to the "Evolution Committee" of the Koyal Society, which I regard as a happy augury for a wider recognition of our science, seeing that its investigations in the workings of the laws of heredity are being carried out largely upon an entomological basis, under the able superintendence of Mr. W. Bateson, M.A., F.R.S., F.E.S. Let me urge all our members to put themselves into communication with Mr. Bateson, and to ascertain in what way tJiei/ can assist in this enquiry. The greater part of the contents of the current volumes of our entomological magazines is of the usual class, indispensable to entomo- logists who wish to keep themselves up to date in their knowledge, but I cannot dwell upon it now. We have to thank our esteemed Vice- President, and former President, Mr. J. A. Clark, for an excellent working-out of aberrations of the protean Peronm cristana in the Knto- iiiold'iist'f^ Iterord, accompanied with beautiful figures of the newly- described forms ; and the same periodical also contains some good work on the Lachneids, by Messrs. Tutt, Bacot, and Warburg, which is timely in view of the third volume of Tutt's BrWuJi Lepidnptera— not yet ready, alas, for the subscribers who are so eagerly awaiting it. In 6 THE ENTOMOLOGIST S HECORD. the Entomologist one notices an attempt to work out some phases of the variation of the genus Erehia upon the lines of the work of Galton, and one wonders whether the articles will further lead us into the mathematical intricacies (without doubt valuable, but somewhat abstruse to the general reader) of Karl Pearson's Grammar of Science. I have not had time to analyse the multitude of continental and American periodical literature, but I judge from an examination of Friedlander's very useful Entomoloiiiache Littcratnrhliittcr, as well as of the magazines placed on the table at the meetings of the Entomological Society of London, that they have contained comparative little of special value to the lepidopterist, and I am not competent to pronounce on the value of that relating to other orders. The principal Eoumanian scientific society has published a two hundred-page list of the Macro- lepidoptera of the country, by E. Fleck, and this was closely followed by a " Micro " list from the pen of Caradja, already well-known for his writings in Iris. Iris, which has very inconveniently changed its title again, being now called Deiitsclie Entotnohujische ZeitscJirift : LcpitliiptrroloijiscJu' Heftc, hardly keeps up its high character since the editorship passed from Staudinger, but is still a very useful publication to lepidopterists. In one or two other of the German papers, the well- known Esthonian lepidopterist, Huene, has been amusing himself by describing and naming aberrations of pala?arctic Heterocera, with the same easy-going disregard for the previous Avork of nomenclators, which Mr. Tutt has had occasion to criticise in another connection in a recent number of the liecord. The naming of aberrations is not without its manifest uses (provided it be not carried to such over- minute detail that it be impossible for the possessor of one aberration to name it without possessing the complete series of forms for com- parison), but surely it should not be undertaken by those Avho have not taken the trouble to overhaul the literature already dealing with the subject. Let us hope that the appearance of the new edition of Staudinger will do something to stem the tide of duplications in nomenclature ; although it is to be feared its inadequate citation of Tutt's Uritish Xoctuae will leave much room for the evil to grow in that family. Of separate works, several of imiwrtance are still in progress, and have made some headway during 1901. The third volume of Hamp- son's " magnum opus " is amongst these, and deals with the remainder of the Arctiadae and with Agaristiilae. I presume Moore's Lej/idojitcra Indira is still in progress, but I do not remember to have seen any new parts during the present year ; of Grose-Smith's Ehojialocera E.iotica, part 56 has appeared. Barrett's British Lcpidoptera is still making- slow progress, the family now under consideration being the Laren- tiadac. Miss Sharpe's Monoi/rajdi of the Gentis Teracdus has also advanced by at least three parts, and Kift'arth has completed his revision of Helicnnius, which I ought to have mentioned under the heading of periodicals (/if'/-/. Ent. Zcit., 1901). The first lepidoptero- logical part of Das Tierreich, namely, Pagenstecher's Eibi/thridae, appeared early in the year, and bas been noticed in the Entoiiudogist's Record. But the most generally important new book of the year has been the long-awaited Catalog of Staudinger and Rebel ; as I am discussing this rather fully in the pages of the i-:nt. llccord, and as some of you have RETROSPECT OF A COLEOPTERIST FOR 1901. 7 already made acquaintance with it, I need not say more about it now. An enterprising American, S. F. Denton, has completed a book on moths and butterflies of the United States " with 400 photographic illustrations in the text and many transfers of species from life." We are told in the advertisement that " after much experiment the author has succeeded in perfecting the art of transferring from the wings of real moths and butterflies to a prepared plate paper the millions of tiny scales in all their perfection, fixing the gorgeous colours and luminous iridescence just as brilliantly as when the insects were alive." I have not yet had an opportunity of studying this new departure, but as the price of the work is only a little over £20, perhaps you will all like to order copies for yourselves. Some useful handbooks may com- plete my list. Such are Kirby's Familiar Butterfiies and Moths ; a new French edition of Berge, by the Abbe de Joannis, which I have not seen, but which ought to be good, if that very able entomologist has revised the text as well as translating ; a new edition of Hofmann, commenced by Dr. Spuler, and promising very well ; and a Russian translation of Standfuss' celebrated Handbiich. Retrospect of a Coleopterist for 1901. By Piioi-EssoK T. HUDSON BEARE, B.Sc, F.R.S.E., F.E.S. I propose in the present article to deal only with the work of British entomologists, reserving some notes on the work of our foreign friends for a future article. In the January number of the Ent. Mo. Mai (much larger than in Catalonia or on the Eiviera), N. semian/ns, P. icarxs, Thanaos tai/es var. Cervantes, Spilothijrits althaeae var. boeticus, tSi/ricthus sao var. enerate. May 21st we took diligence to Lanjaron, a small watering-place on the southern slope of the Sierra Nevada, where Ave found good quarters at the Hotel San Koque (entirely Spanish). Lanjaron is a very picturesque place, overlooking the lower hills to the southwards down to the Mediterranean, with fine orange orchards and vineyards all round, ridges rising to the snow immediately behind, and steep glens falling in precipices to the hot, lower valleys, close below the town. Here we spent six days, three of which were hopelessly wet, and the other three only partially fine, so we did not meet with much success with the butterflies. We made three attempts to ascend the ridge behind the town, but as soon as we got about 1000ft. up it, we always came into the clouds, wbich got thiclver the higher we went, so that by the time we reached the snow we thought it best to turn back for fear of losing ourselves. Descending into the glens below us, we found much the same insects as at Granada, only in smaller numbers. 21. deiune was, however, very plentiful, and we got some nice specimens of P. conjdon var. albicans flying in scorcbingly hot dry watercourses, where they were scarcely distinguishable from the white rocks they haunted. E. ida and E. pasiphae weva both common among the cistus, and E.jiu-tina var. Inspidla was out in some num- bers— replacing the type. A. latJwnia and A. pandora also made their appearance, but only very few of these were seen. On the 27th we returned to Granada, and there spent three more very wet days, im- patiently watching the clouds, which did not lift till the 30th, when I had two more delightful days on the " coto " ridge. I found E. pasiphac and E. ida plentiful, also Aporia crataei/i and Tliecla ilicis just out, but nothing very remarkable. The larvte of S. proto swarmed on the sage bushes, and I collected several, from which two excellent specimens were reared by Lord Walsingham. On June 1st I left Granada with much regret, and by travelling straight through reached England on the 4th, after an enjoyable and successful excursion, not- withstanding the wet weather, Avhich is very unusual in Spain so late in the spring. Apis dorsata, Fabr., considered in the light of Domestication. By 11. HAMLYN-IIAERIS, F.R.M.S., F.Z.S., F.E.S. It is now some years since the idea was first conceived, that by the introduction of Apis dorsata (known as the Giant Bee of India), a APIS DORSATA, FABR., CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF DOMESTICATION. 13 valuable addition to our fauna would be obtained, yielding a larger quantity of honey and wax, and generally more profitable than our honey-bee, Apis mellifica and its difi'erent varieties — var. li[/ustica, var. carniolia, etc. According to Dalla Torre : — Apis dorsata, Fabr., occurs in Assam, IndiTl and Java ( ¥ cT 5 )• Var. hicolor, Klug, occurs in Assam, India, Ceylon and Java. Var. testacea, Smith, occurs in Assam and Borneo ( ? 5 )• Var. zonata, occurs in Assam, Celebes ( ? ) and the Philippines. [The var. zonata also occurs in India, which is not mentioned by Dalla Torre.] About three years ago a special enquiry was set on foot to ascertain whether or not the Giant Bee of India was really a suitable subject for domestication. At that time I was permitted to look over various reports at the India Office, and all these agreed that Apis dorsata, mentioned generally under native names, could not be domesticated on account of its intractable character. The chief points noted are :^ 1. It is said to be exceedingly vicious, often attacking man or beast on the smallest provocation. 2. It preserves the same habits and ajjpearance wherever its habitat. 3. It has never been known to build its nest under shelter, but mostly on isolated lofty trees or overhanging rocks. 4. After the honey season the bees will desert their nests, and often travel for long periods and great distances, even crossing such mountain chains as the Nilgherris in their course. 5. They build single combs. C. And are used to approach from north, south, east, or west. 7. They rarely remain in one locality for more than three weeks, emigrating as flowers become scarcer. We will consider these points more in detail, to make the subject better understood. Among the hill-men, near Darjeeling (Eastern Himalayas), this bee is known by the name Cargoo, and is generally an object of fear and dislike — according to Sladen. It will be readily seen that the risk of introducing such a bee, even were it possible, into a thickly populated country would be too great. Not only the hill- men of Darjeeling find Apis dursata an undesirable neighbour, but all are agreed on the subject who have had any experience in the matter. Interesting, however, is the way in which the natives of the Malay Archipelago, for instance, take the comb and honey, showing much courage on their part. Perhaps, also, the Apis dorsata may be some- what less dreaded in the islands than on the mainland of India. The native, having located the nest (built some 70 to 80 feet from the ground, sometimes even more"), repairs by night to the spot, and after a wearisome climb, sometimes lasting an hour, with only the smoke fumes of a torch, drives the bees away from the combs, which are then severed from the boughs and let down by cords to his helpers below. Such a rough and ready style of proceeding must necessarily aggravate the bees, and stings, as one may suppose, are plentiful ; still the tribesmen do not seem much concerned. It is well known that one of the greatest obstacles to the domestication of this bee is its natural wildness and its inability to settle permanently in one spot. When we consider that Apis dorsata usually makes its nest in wild and rocky country, only remaining in one locality so long as flowers abound, we shall better realise why it moves from place to place, and the impoi-tance of so doing to its general welfare. Therefore we see that only by completely altering its natural habits could we hope to domesticate this bee, or bring it into use under diflering circumstances * This is for protection against the bears, which are (as is known) fond of honey, and would climb the trees in search of it. 14 THE ENTOJIOLOGISt's RECORD. from those in which it has always lived. Also on account of its size, and the power of its flight, the Giant Bee will travel as much as a hundred miles before again settling down to home life.'''- It is not so much the honey gathered by these bees which is valuable to the natives, but the large quantities of comb they produce, the latter, being melted down into wax, forms a valuable article of industry in India. The hill- men do not trouble much about the honey, but are said to eat the young bees and larvne with great gusto. Another hindrance to domes- tication is the way they build their nests, quite in the open, entirely unprotected, and always single combs from about five feet to six feet in length, and about two feet to three feet in depth. Some fine specimens of these combs are to be seen in the South Kensington Natural History Museum. When a species of insect has been used to certain habits for endless generations, in fact has never known any others, it will be readily understood how difficult would be the problem presented to us did we attempt to keep such a refractory creature in confinement. The only attempt made seems to have been a failure. A queen bee was tied by a thread to a stick and placed in the hollow of a tree, and after two to three months a very small piece of comb was found, and the experiment proving useless was aban- doned. Since this a writer to the last Government report says that " He had seven hives all well and fed for the Avinter," but in the spring the " little brutes " decamped by twenty and thirty a day, until each queen in turn left its hive in disgust. Clipping the queen's wings, as is done in modern bee-keeping, would prove fatal to Apis dnnata. On account of her uncontrollable character she Avould prob- ably be lost. The question arises, if we cannot domesticate Aj)iii ilorsata itself, could Ave by judicious crossing attain the desired end ? The best ansAver to this question Avill, I think, be found in the fact that European bees exist which are closely allied to a species found in northern India, Avhich never crossed Avith Apis dnrsata. All these facts considered, there only remains Apis indica, very similar to our European bee, with which domestication might be a success, but if any real advantage Avould arise therefrom or not is doubtful, but no doubt can remain that the facts relating to Apis dnrsata must for eA'er bar the Avay to its domestication. * A2)is dorsata is, however, inclined to fly somewhat chimsily, and to visit flowers somewhat listlesslv. Notes on the British Myrmecophilous fauna (excluding Coleoptera). By HORACE DONISTHORPE, F.Z.S., F.E.S. Ants' nests, as is well knoAvn, are inhabited all over the AA'orld by many different kinds of creatures. These occur in such situations from various reasons. Some are true guests of the ants, being fed by them like their OAvn oftspring ; from others, such as some of the beetles, aphides, and scale insects, the ants obtain SAveet juices Avhich are excreted by them. Many are scavengers in the nests, feeding on the dead bodies of the ants and their prey, waste vegetable substances and other refuse. Others, again, are parasites in the true sense of the word, living in, or on, the ants themselves, their eggs, or larvae. Numbers are more or less like ants in appearance, such as some spiders, beetles, bugs, etc., and these " mimics " are generally found NOTES ON THE BRITISH MYRMECOPHILOUS FAUNA. 15 with ants, if not actually in the nests, their resemblance to the ants protecting them no doubt from outside enemies. Some creatures only pass their earlier stages in the nests, being always found at large in the perfect stage. Finally there are the chance guests, which, though not always occurring with ants, are very often found with them. The myrmecophilous fauna, with the exception of the order coleoptera, having been much neglected in this country, and such records as there are being very fragmentary and scattered, I have endeavoured to collect together all the available information published on the subject. I also record for the first time my own captures, some of which are new to this country, and my experience of the habits of the insects. I would here especially thank Messrs. Buckton, Collin, Enock,McLachlan, Michael, Morley, Saunders, Sinclair, Verrall and the Kev. 0. Pickard- Cambridge, for kindly helping me in their different orders. Lacertilia. — Amjuis frai/ilis. — My friend Mr. A. J. Chitty, tells me that he has frequently taken the slow-worm in the nests of Formica fasca, at Dorington, in Kent. I think this is worth recording, as the Auipliisbaena, a blind, snake-like lizard lives in the nests of the leaf- cutting ants on the Amazons. In Guiana, a legless lizard, Coecilia anniddsa (sometimes called the double-headed snake, its body being equally thick at both ends), lives in the nests of the leaf -gathering ant. Hyjien'optera.— Fo;'/»?'e^/ac. — Sole)iopsifi fiu/ax, Ltr. — This small robber ant lives at the expense of other large species of ants. Sir John Lubbock says {Ants, Bees, and Wasps, p. 78), "It makes its chambers and galleries in the walls of the nests of larger species and is the bitter enemy of its hosts. The latter cannot get at them, because they are too large to enter the galleries. The little Solenopsis, therefore, is quite safe, and, as it appears, makes incursions into the nurseries of the larger ant, and carries oft" the larvffi as food." Sharp figures a nest of Formica fnsca with chambers of this little, ant in it {(Jamb. Nat. Hist., Insects, pt. ii., p. 1B7). Wasmann records it from Europe and North Africa with nearly all the larger species of ants {Mi/rm. u. Term. Art., 1894, p. 162). Formicoxenns nitidnliis, Nyl. {Stenamma trestiroodi, aut.). — This is another species found with larger ants. Sir John Lubbock {loc. cit., p. 78) says, "The little Stenamma n-estiroodii, is found exclusively in the nests of the much larger F. ritfa, and the allied F. pratensis.^* Wasmann {Inc. cit., p. 162) gives the same two species as its normal hosts, and Sharp {loc. cit., p. 160) adds F. comierens. Mr. Chitty and I took it in a nest of Formica riifa, in the Blean Woods, in May, 1901. Formica sawjuinea, Ltr. — This is the slave-making ant, for which purpose it chiefly uses Formica fnsca. Sharp {loc. cit., p. 150) says that F. cnnienlaria and possibly L. jlarus, are also utilised by F. scnvjiiinea in England. Their expeditions to attack neighbouring nests, and methods of obtaining slaves are too well known to be entered into here. Many other species of ants besides F. fnsca are found in their nests. F. Smith writes in the Fnt. Annnal for 1868, p. 91, "I have received from a young and most observant hymenopterist, a list of species found in a nest of F. sannninea, at Shirley ;..../''. _/'».scrt, common ; F. ni(/ra and F. jlava, several specimens; Taj>inoina erratica, Mi/mica rmiinodis and M. scabrinodis, common ; M. lobicornis, the workers very abundant, but only one female ; Leptothorax acevnmm, all the sexes, abundant in August ; L. nylanderi, several specimens." 16 THE entomologist's eecoed. Lasius fJavus, Beg. — I found a colony of this ant using the same tree as a nest of Laaius fulif/inoms at Lymington, both species coming in and going out together. Ponera contracta, Ltr. — Farren White records {Ants and Their Ways, p. 239) that " Mr. Janson found it in company with F. fnliyin- osHs. I have a specimen found in the same situation, presented me by Mr. Shepherd, of Fleet Street." I took a specimen in a nest of Formica fusca at Doddington, Kent, in May, 1901. Leptofhorax ocevurnm, F, — Farren White records (loc. cit., p. 171) finding it with F. sanr/Hinea on Shirley Common. I have taken it in the nest of F. rufa at Weybridge. Leptothorax n)jlanderi,Foerst. — F. Smith says {Inc. o?'i.,p. 94), " The Leptothorax nijlanderi ha.s never been found in any other situation than in ants' nests, usually those of Formica rnfa." I have taken several specimens in the nest of Lasius fali. albiptmrta, tAvo of the former at sugared trees and two at sugared sunflowers. These latter I find a very attractive bait. — E. B. Robertson, Forest View, Southborne Road, Boscombe. Xoveinbcr 11th, 1901. Sphinx convolvuli at CnixaFORD. — I have to record that several Splthhv conrolntli were taken during the past autumn at Chingford. — A. J. Croker, Connaught Road, Chingford. Xucoitbcr loth, 1901. Autumnal Lepidoptera at Oxton. — Sjihin.v conculcuU was common during the autumn. On November 9th I bred a 2 Zvnowiim jiorata from ova laid by a ? taken in north Devon, the rest of the brood showing no sign of emerging. The first Asteroacojuis upldiuc occurred in the light traps on the morning of November 5th, and on the ] 1th I had sixteen, then the frost set in, and I have had none since. — E. F. C. Studd, M.A., F.E.S., Oxton, Exeter. Xovewher 19R ACTIO AL HINTS.* Field Work for January and February. By J. W. TUTT, F.E.S. 1. — To force Macrothylacia rubi and Spilosoma fuliginosa, place the larvae (after having been exposed to the weather for part of winter) in a box with damp moss, and the box in a warm greenhouse or kitchen, keep temperature up to about 80"^ F., the larvfe will spin up almost at once without further feeding, and the imagines will emerge in from two to four weeks (Moss). 2. — The cocoons of SaUirnia pavonia are easily found on the moors when the heather is wintered ; they are either on the heather, or on the ground loose, the latter situation being almost as common as the * Practical Hints fob the Field Lepidopterist, recently published, contftins 1,250 similar hints to these, distributed over every month in the year. Interleaved for collectors own notes). — Ed. 28 THE entomologist's kecord. former ; the important factor for succeRS is to search for them when the vegetation is dead (Arbnthnott). 3. — Cocoons of Satitrnia jmronia may also be found in whitethorn hedges in winter, spun up on the lower branches about a foot from the top of the bank on which the hedge grows. They are most dil^cult to see when the foliage is on the trees, and, although exposed when the leaves fall, the colour is so like that of the surrounding branches that it would be easy to miss them (Ransom). 4.^The haunts of Scuta iiiaiitima are usually coincident with those of Nona;/ rid (jcmiuijiiincta, the larva? of the former wintering in the old burrows of the latter. The larvje are easily obtained in a hard winter, when one can more readily examine the dead reeds that fringe the sides of lakes and moors. They have also been found in the old galleries of Nuna(jyia animliitis und N. cayinaem Tijiiha latifolia (Dadd). 5. — During the first week of February I searched the stone walls and dykes that separate the fields in Aberdeen, etc., for cocoons of Arctoinjsris var. jin/ricac, and in a few hours picked up a dozen around Pitcaple ; the snow, however, was very deep and the cold intense, and these factors much interfered with a more successful hunt (Reid). 6. — Imagines of Ni/fisia lds}ndaria are to be taken in late February and March, newly emerged and drying their wmgs between 4 p.m. and 5 p.m. on the lower part of the trunks of oaks. 7. — In February and IMarch Hybernia Icucoiihaearia, Phifialia pedaria, Xr/^sia liiapidaria, Amjdn'dasys stratan'a, are found commonly by trunk-hunting on the outskirts of the London district — Richmond Park, Chingford, itc. 8. — Imagines of Hyhcrnia Iciicnphaearia are common on trunks of oaktrees, in February and March, some drying their wings during the forenoon in the sunshine, the lantern revealing them, however, still freshly emerging after dusk. Phhjalia jiedaria may be found at the- same time and are often seen hanging with limp wings on the oak trunks at about 8 p.m. 9. — The spring Hybernias are all common in Epping in February and March ; very fine aberrations of male Hyhi'tnia leucuphaearni and also ? s, are to be obtained on fences and tree-trunks in the daytime ; H. rtipicapraria on every hawthorn hedge, the ? s about an hour after dark are found at the bottom of the hedges, latter on they get higher, and are seen on the outside as well as towards the middle of the bushes ; the $ s of H. nmryinaria are to be found freely on tree-trunks after dark with a lantern, some of the 3 s are very fairly dark. 10. — ^The larv;t of Boanuia roburaria may be beaten from oaks when beating for larva) of L'leora lichcnaria in February, before the oak- buds show the slightest sign of leaf. They must loose hold of their silken pad surprisingly early ; the larva) also feed on sallow, white- thorn and birch, feeding up well in confinement on sallow (Moberly). 11. — Early hatching larvjc of Poccilocawpa popxdi may be fed up on lettuce ; eggs often hatch out-of-doors before the food-plants are available. 12. — At the end of February place your cocoons of Diiiiorjdia versicolor a in the sun during the day, and in a warm kitchen at night and during dull weather ; few pupre will then go over to a second year. The imagines will only pair in the sun or in a fairly high artificial temperature, but given these they will do so and lay well. Vol. XIV. Pl. I. Structural details of Oeoyia splendida. Kntom. Record, etc., l'.)():l. BUTTERFLY HUNTING IN GREECE IN THE YEAR 1900. 29 Butterfly Hunting in Greece, in the year 1900. By MAEGARET E. FOUNTAINS, F.E.S. For several years I have traversed the countries of central and southern Europe, a somewhat grotesque figure, armed with a butterfly- net. I have wandered along tlae glorious shores of the Mediterranean, on the French and Italian Rivieras, and up the mountain gorges of the Bassos-Alpes, where, in the neighbourhood of Digne, at least, the butterfly-catcher is no longer an object of idle curiosity to the natives, who have long since grown accustomed to him as " a figure in the view," Digne being a locality of such vast repute in the " butterfly world." Then, too, I have trod the dry arid hill-sides of Andalusia, where the dwarf palm grows in clusters, and vegetation does not seem to flourish. I have climbed to the lofty alpine pastures of Switzerland and North Italy, and penetrated through the dense mountain forests of Hungary, so still and soundless, save for the silent droppings of the beech-nuts, and the faint whisper of the summer wind among the tree-tops. I have also visited the Island of Corsica, which might be a small item from another planet, for all the resemblance its ways and customs bear to any other spot on earth, possessing, moreover, a separate fauna, as it shares with its neighbour. Sardinia, the interesting fact, that many of its animals, birds and various insects (butterflies by no means excepted), as well as plants, are peculiar to these two islands, and not to be found onthemainland of France or Italy, or, indeed, any other country in the world. Sicily, too, is a glorious spot, one vast flower-garden in the month of May, a fruit-orchard in June, and in July a parched-up wilderness. All these countries do I know, and knowing, love. The happy hunting-grounds of the Red Indian could not have been pictured in more glowing colours to the eyes of imagination than must these southern lands — the happy hunting-grounds of the entomologist — for ever remain in the memory of those who have visited them in order to enjoy the pleasures of "la chasse aux papillons ! " In the year 1900 I spent the months of May and June in Greece, and it is my humble hope that the experiences herein recorded may possibly claim some slight interest from at least a few of the readers of this journal. Now I am not going to write about Athens, to enlarge upon the sublime beauties of the Acropolis, and so on, because that is the archaeologists' province, upon which I fear to tread, besides, most people know all about that already. Ordinary tourists will almost invariably take their passage on board an Austrian Lloyd, or Italian steamer at Brindisi, spend a few days, or a week, in passing, on the lovely Island of Corfu, proceed by boat to Patras, or perhaps the Piraeus, en route for Athens, where they probably remain a week or two, and then, bidding farewell to the Hellenic shores, they sail foi- other lands, and consider that they are now in a position to say they have "seen Greece!" But merely to have visited Athens and its immediate neighbourhood is, in my humble opinion, by no means to have " seen Greece ! " and it was into that fascinating, half-civilised region, generally spoken of amongst the English colony in Athens, as " the Interior," that my inclinations, as an entomologist, prompted me to explore. Of the various hardships and inconveniences I had been led to suppose I should have to encounter in so doing, I do not think, on the whole, I had received at all an exaggerated description. February 15th, 1902. 30 THK entomologist's RECORD. The Greek roads bore in many places a striking' resemblance to the partially hardened surface of a ploughed field, and frequently there were no roads at all, but only bridle-paths, for the principal mode of locomotion in Greece is on horseback. This threw my bicycle com- pletely " out of work ; " but horses were to be hired everywhere, at from five to seven drachmas for the whole day ; though of course such a thing as a side-saddle, was an absolutely unknown item of civilisation. The inns in the country towns and villages are rough to a degree, and hemiptera, other than those to be sought for outside by the entomolo- gist engaged in the study of that class of insects, were in some of these inns extremely plentiful. In fact though the food was bad the accom- modation was worse. The Greek innkeeper often seemed to think that to have two sheets on a bed was an unnecessary luxury ; and sometimes they provided none at all. Luckily, owing to the kindness of a friend, I was prepared to meet this contingency. Towels also were not visible unless specially ordered. But they manage to provide their guests with a greasy hair-brush and comb, and also with an old clothes brush ; to say nothing of a piece of untempting looking scrub- bing soap ; all of which articles of luxury (?) I used to collect in a heap, telling Marcus (my Greek courier) to cause them immediately to be removed from my presence and never to let them appear again. Nor were these all the contingencies to be provided for in choosing a room in a Greek Hotel, as I would perhaps be told that the charge was one drachma (6d.) a night, and then, while I was inwardly con- gratulating myself that travelling in " the Interior" was at all events not ruinous, I Avould l^e shown into a good -sized room, barely fur- nished, but with perhaps two or three beds in it. I remember at Tripolitza, deciding upon an apartment of this description, when I happened to remark (of course through the medium of Marcus), that those other two beds might just as well be removed as it would give rae more space, to which the prompt reply was : — " Oh ! but you see someone else may arrive ! " — and then I grasped the full horror of the situation ; the one drachma a night was for the b^J and not exclusively for the room. As matters stood I should be liable to return from one of our long butterfly-hunting expeditions into the mountains to find some objectionable Greek female established in another corner of mi/ room. The idea was intolerable, but the way out of the difficulty was obvious ; I must hire all the three beds in order to prevent anyone else from doing so. But all this and more must be endured by the butterfly collector in Greece, with just as much patience and resignation as he may happen to have at his command. Yet there was a pleasing variety in the quality of these discomforts, and at Delphi, though the so-called hotel was only a little bungalow-dwelling in the main street, with not so many as half-a-dozen rooms in it all told, the landlord of this unpretentious little habitation who was, I had heard, celebrated as the ugliest and most honest man in Greece, proved himself to be quite worthy of both epithets, and also was so far comparatively accustomed to provide for the English tourist, as to be aware that one of our indispensable little weaknesses is the demand for cleanliness in all things. For Delphi being a place of great archaeological interest is on this account occasionally visited by travellers. There are not very many railways in Greece, and the trains are extremely slow and leisurely in their movements, so much so that BUTTERFLY HUNTING IN GREECE IN THE YEAR 1900. 31 there is no sort or kind of objection raised when the passengers walk along the footboards outside the carriages while the train is at full speed, should they be disposed to do so. I did this once myself on the little branch railway from Dhiakopto up to Kalavryta, when I found my quarters in the small first-class compartment next the engine, a trifle too warm in consequence of the hot smoke which was constantly pouring into it. As I knew there was no stop till Zachlorou, and that there were several long tunnels, I considered it just as well not to run the risk of being suftbcated in one of them. With Marcus it was a common practice also to get in after the train had well started. The first time I saw him standing coolly on the platform, as we were slowly steaming out of the station, I naturally thought to myself " Why, that fool Marcus has been left behind." But he soon set my mind at ease on this point, by shortly afterwards appearing at the window of my carriage, to have a few minutes' friendly conversation during the journey, a little habit of his to which I soon became quite accustomed. I once asked him if he had carried on these practices during his trip to England, to which he replied " Only once, and then I was told if I ever did so again 1 should be fined." Having found the country round Tripolitza so dry and barren as to be apparently utterly unproductive from an entomological point of view, we were returning on the line of railway between that place and Corinth, when the train suddenly stopped in the midst of the moun- tains, nowhere near any evidences of what could possibly be mistaken for a station, and IMarcus appeared to inform me that the cause for this was "the grasshoppers." So many of them were there that to proceed would be impossible, without running the risk of the engine slipping off the rails. I looked out and saw that the ground was covered with one moving mass of orthoptera. There was not a square inch of earth or visible blade of grass that was not densely populated with these creatures, but as I am a lepidopterist and not an orthop- terist, I am unable to say to what species they belonged. Impromptu brushes had to be made of the scrub and brush wood, and these Avere placed in front of the engine, and by this means the line was swept clear enough for the train to proceed in safety. The Greek butterflies that I was most anxious to obtain were Pieris kri'fpcii, P. enjane, Eiirhloc (/nmeri (E. damone I knew must be over long ago, as it only flies in the early spring), CoUas heldreichi (most especially), Mdananjia larhsa, Chrysojilianits ottomamis, C. thetis, and Satj/rus (jracca. All of these I succeeded in taking with the exception of the two last-named species, both of which I should imagine to be July insects, as I left Greece at the end of June without seeing any specimen of them. Pieris kriiperi was common just outside Delphi in May, on a southern slope of the mountain near some red rocks, about 100ft. above the ruins, but the ground was difficult, and krhpcri is a rapid flyer ; it was easier to take it in the partially dried up bed of a stream a short distance from the village, on the left of the main road going towards Arakhova, which was a favourite drinking fountain and place of rendez- vous for all thirsty butterflies. The spring brood — var. rernalis — ^Avas flying with the summer brood the year I was in Greece, though most of the specimens of var. vemalis were worn, especially the females, which was remarkable as they had probably emerged a week or ten 32 THE ENTO:\rOLOGIST's RECORD. days later than the males. Delphi is about 2000ft. above the sea level ; and a few days later, down at Loutraki, a comparatively modern place, on the shores of the Gulf of Corinth, I found kriiperi only, but in excellent condition. They were up a gorge not more than 100ft. from the level of the dried-up, arid plain, where, in the month of May, the barley harvest was being cut and carried on the backs of mules to be thrashed shortly afterwards beneath the feet of some five or six horses which were made to trot round in a circle over the scattered ears. In this plain I also found Satynix awaltJico ; the females being equally common with the males (which is so rarely the case with any butterfly), though they were somewhat dissimilar in their habits, as the latter were generally only to be found down on the open plain, while the females preferred to haunt the lower slopes of the mountain. These latter remained in hiding during the hot hours of midday under the grateful shadows of the huge rocks and boulders at the foot of the gorge, from which seclusion sometimes six or eight at a tiine would, on being disturbed, fly out lazily from beneath one rock, while they seemed supremely indifferent to, and independent of, the little males, who were besporting themselves in the glaring heat of the plain below, where the oleander bushes grew in the dry stony bed of the torrent. Pieris eruanc, which was common enough near Delphi and in the neighbourhood of Kalavryta, did not apparently occur so low down as Loutraki, whilst Euchlvi' (jr'nneri seemed to be exclu- sively a mountain butterfly. It flew in certain localities (no doubt in the immediate vicinity of its food-plant) accessible both from Delphi and Kalavryta, but it was practically over by the third week in May. Melanarfiia lariaaa seemed to be fairly widely distributed, from the middle of May and throughout the month of June, though the Lout- raki specimens in May were much finer and more deeply coloured than those I took later at Kalavryta in June. The Lyca?nids in Greece were, as a whole, distinctly disappointing. However the var. helena of Nomiades semianiiis was extremely interesting. It occurred plenti- fully all round Kalavryta in May, and most of the specimens were very marked ; the orange band on the upperside being remarkably broad and distinct in nearly all the females captured. The var. parnasxia of this same species occurred near Delphi, but no Iwlcua appeared north of the Gulf of Corinth. I also took a few specimens of Poh/onunatiis zepln/nis near Kalavryta in June ; and an interesting form of Pnli/owmatKs cuiiicdon near Delphi in May, without any traces of the arrow mark on the underside of the hindwings, except, indis- tinctly, in the case of one female. In order to secure ('Iiri/Miphanus ottomannsl had been told that I must visit Mesolonghi, another place on the sea-level, but very different from Loutraki. Instead of the dry, arid shores of the Gulf of Corinth, Mesolonghi lay surrounded by low, damp meadows, and unhealthy marshes — a perfect fever-bed of snakes and mosquitoes. Marcus did not appreciate the snakes at all, though he was never so vehement in his protestations that he was " not afraid " of them, as when he had just jumped half a foot off the ground at the sight of one ; or possibly on no greater provocation than the rustle of a lizard in the grass ! 13ut C oWnnaniis had to be captured, so snakes and mosquitoes alike must for the time being be put up with. And this was the chosen haunt of this brilliant little butterfly, flashing like a spark BUTTERFLY HUNTING IN GRBlECK IN THE YEAR 1900. 83 of fire amongst the tall green reeds and luxuriant flower-mingled grasses, but it was not so easy to find, and some days elapsed before we came across it at all. But at last Marcus, to his great joy, secured a magnificent female. Still we had not really discovered, so to speak, its headquarters, till one day, when Marcus had gone off for a holiday to Patras, and I was out alone, I encountered what appeared to be a rather evil-disposed person, and in order to disembarrass myself of this individual I gave him the slip by pretending to go in hot pursuit after some imaginary butterfly -rarity. Once out of sight I lost no time in taking refuge in flight, by making oft" in an opposite direction ; nor did 1 halt till I had covered some considerable distance ; and by this means I came upon a spot near a little chapel, which we had not pre- viously visited, where ('. otUnnaniis (at least the males) flew in some abundance. So the evil-disposed person did me a good turn after all. I was much surprised to find Para vac roxdana also in this neighbour- hood. It seemed such a wonderful contrast to the grand Hungarian forests in the Carpathians, where I had hitherto met with it always at a certain elevation, to come across it here in these moist meadows and marshes, down at sea -level. Lord Byron is the hero of Mesolonghi, as indeed he is of the whole of Greece, his statue in the Public Gardens is almost worshipped, and the little mound hard by, encased in a covering of cannon balls, beneath which lies the heart of this wonderful man, is also a spot ever to be looked upon by the Greeks with the deepest veneration. Another public erection at Mesolonghi, situated in a central position in the town, is a large square, solid block of l)uildings, detached on all sides, upon which the pitiless glare of the southern sun pours down merci- lessly and relentlessly from morn till eve. This building is the common prison, the wretched inmates of which were herded together like cattle in a pen, but were allowed the privilege of sitting at the barred windows of their prison-house, if they were so disposed, and getting what solace they could by attracting the attention of the passers-by. Some of the countenances of these men were savage and repulsive, others were sad and worn. Many wore the national dress, the folded white linen tunic, looking as if it had never been removed since the time of their arrest, as indeed in many cases it probably never had ; some few of them looked cheerful and resigned, almost as though they found a sense of humour in their present surroundings. It was with one of these last that I once held (of course through the medium of Marcus) a short conversation. I began by expressing regret to see him where he was, for which he thanked me ; so I went on to say that I hoped he would soon be released. " In two months," was the reply, " and I have already been here ten." Finding that he by no means resented the idle curiosity which prompted my friendly inquiries, but on the contrary seemetl rather gratified by it, I waxed bolder, and told Marcus to ask him what he had done to merit this term of imprisonment. This was apparently quite the most fetching question I had yet put to him, for he smiled sweetly, and said he had " tried to kill a man," which crime, he explained on further inquiry, he had attempted to effect by shooting at him with a pistol in a fit of rage, adding (unasked) that his only regret was that he had not succeeded in the attempt. Still I could not help feeling sorry for this man, and I would generally give him a friendly nod and smile as I rode by on my bicycle. A 84 THE entomologist's rkcord. week or two later, when I was up in the mountains at Kalavryta, and the thermometer was standing, even at that elevation, at from 80^ to 90° F. in the shade, I used to think of these wretched prisoners, and what their sufferings must be, pent up day and night, in that swelter- ing oven down at Mesolonghi. There were two monasteries in the neighbourhood of Kalavryta, both celebrated for patriotic reasons. The monastery of Hagia Lavra is distinguished for having been the first place in Greece from whence waved the flag of freedom after the occupation of the Turks, and the monastery of Megaspelaeon, still more celebrated for having been the only place in Greece, which, owing to its absolutely impregnable situation, never surrendered to the Turks at all. The word Megaspelaeon implies " built into the rock," and this is exactly what it is. Several hundred feet of precipitous rock rise up immediately above this wonderful structure, which is only approachable from below by a zigzag bridle- path winding up the steep mountain side. The monks and priests of the Greek Church are not close-shaven like their Catholic neighbours, but on the contrary they seem to prefer the cultivation of long patri- archal beards, so that their appearance is altogether a great deal more pleasing, not to say picturesque. The expression of their faces is often sad, and they give one the idea of men who have grasped the responsi- bility of life, and are trying to act accordingly. Their hospitality to travellers and strangers is charming, and though their fare is simple, and their mode of living of the roughest, their courtesy and simplicity is ever calculated to command respect. On one occasion when we were out collecting beyond the monastery of Hagia Lavra, a bright sunny morning had clouded over to end in a downpour of rain, accompanied by thunder and lightning, such as seldom occurs save in these hot southern countries, and though we rode as quickly as was possible over the rocky mountain paths, I arrived at the monastery drenched tlirough and through. At once the kindly monks were ready to render me any service that lay in their power. They had a kind of open stove filled with hot smouldering cinders placed at my disposal, and also provided me with a cassock, with many apologies that they were not in a position to offer me a more strictly feminine garment, while my own dress was being dried. Then later on they placed before us a simple luncheon of poached eggs and a kind of sweet confiture, very palatable at first, but which I afterwards found was quite the reverse to an acquired taste. This stuff is made from rose leaves and sugar, and is invariably placed before the guest who visits these monasteries. Marcus hastily told me in English that to offer any remuneration for the hospitality received would be considered as an insult. My best thanks, expressed through the medium of himself, he said, was all I was in a position to bestow. None of these monks spoke any language but Greek, so that on one occasion when I was purposing to pay another visit to Megas- pelaeon, Marcus being away at Patras again for two days, I was glad to secure the companionship of a " gentleman from Turkey," who spoke a little P^ngiish, and Avhom I happened to meet in the train returning from Zachlorou. He told me he was a Greek, but had come from Turkey to sell bibles (he himself belonged to the Keformed Church) and was now on his way to Kalavryta with that end in view. 1 suggested that it might perhaps be more to the purpose if he stopped in Turkey, and tried to convert a few Mahometans ; to which he replied RETROSPECT OF A DU'TEKIST KOK I'JOl. 35 in his broken English " They are very fanatic," and dismissed the subject evidently as though it were rather a sore point. I happened to say that I purposed going to Megaspelaeon on the morrow. " Perhaps I shall come too," he remarked composedly, and I, seeing my way to an impromptu interpreter, replied "Perhaps you shall — we will see about it." The result of which was that, shortly after I had returned to the inn in Kaluvryta, he arrived " to see about it." So I arranged matters from the wooden balcony outside my window, while the Bible- seller stood in the street below. And a very pleasant and useful com- panion did he prove himself to be ; and he certainly supplied a want, though his conversation at times was rather like that of a methodist preacher. But it was gratifying to show Marcus on his return how well I had managed to get on during his absence. It was not only in the monasteries that I received hospitality, the same feeling, with a few exceptions, was shown by the peasants, more especially by the shepherds, who were always ready to supply us with milk or cream cheese, if they had it ; and, on being asked what payment they required, would, as a rule, spread out their hands saying " Tipote ! Tipote ! " (Nothing! Nothing!) But the few exceptions to this rule were perfectly exorbitant in their demands, and had to be dealt with accordingly. I do not recommend anyone to travel in this interesting country if he is at all anxious to receive his letters with any sort or kind of regularity or certainty. The postal arrangements appeared to me to be almost without any organisation whatever. I would some- times receive no letters for two or three weeks, and then, suddenly, some ten or twelve would arrive all together, and this in spite of my invariably causing Marcus to send telegrams to Athens and elsewhere, whenever I changed my address. I heard the same complaint from all whom I met, except from the Greeks themselves, and they main- tain that their postal arrangements are admirably managed, and in no way different from those of " Europe." They always spoke of Europe as a thing apart from Greece, as though they considered themselves to belong to another continent. {'Tu be concluded.) Retrospect of a Dipterlst for 1901. By J. E. COLLIN, F.E.S. The amount of work done during the past year (1901) in attempt- ing to forward the study of diptera was, as usual, small in volume com- pared with that done in other orders of insects, but the quality and usefulness of at least some of the work cannot be denied. On the continent valuable Monographs have been published — of the European Pluiridac by Becker {Ahh. k. I,-. -^ooL-hot. (res. If'tV«., i., 100 pp., 5 pis.), of the Xi/cteribidac by Speiser {Arch. Xutiin/., 68 pp., 1 pL), and Kietter has begun a " Monograph of the European and Algerian (Jcridouij/idae" {Ann. Soc. Ent.Fr., 1900, 292 pp., 80 pis.), which, although appearing in the Annales for 1900 was published in 1901. Wagner has continued his " Aphanipterologische Studien " {Home Soc. Ent. Itossi.), and Enderlein has also contributed a short paper on the same subject {Zool. .lahrb. Jena) ; Pandelle has continued his "Etudes sur les Muscides de France " (published in connection with 36 THE entomologist's reookd. the llev. Knt. France), and among other authors of short papers on various families of diptera may be mentioned the names of Hendel, Strobl, and Czerny, Papers on morphology and histology have been published by Noack " Beitriige zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Musciden," and by Wahl " Ueber die Entwicklung der hypodermalen Imaginalschreiben im Thorax und Abdomen der Larve von Eristalis, Latr," {Zeitschr. Tl'/.ss. Zool. Lci})zi(j); and by Escherisch "Ueber die Bildung der Keimbliltter bei den Musciden " {Acta Ac. German, 69 pp., 3 pis.) ; while among other writers on the same subjects may be mentioned the names of Vallc, Enderlein, Meijere, and Miiggenburg. The interest taken in the question of the dissemmation of malaria by mosquitoes has induced people to closely investigate the anatomy and physiology of the mosquito (AiKijilwle!^), and the results have been published in such papers as those of Christophers {Rep. Malar, ('ovi)n. Fioi/. Soc), and Nuttall and Shipley {Joiirn. Hygiene Cambriihie), while the whole question of the mos(]uito-malavial theory has been attacked from all sides and a quantity of literature published upon the subject. It is probable that the interest this question has caused people to take in mosquitoes will be the means of the Culicidae becoming one of the best worked out families of the diptera. F. V. Theobald's " Mono- graph of the ( itUcidae or Mosquitoes " (London : 8 vols. Printed by Order of the Trustees of the British Museum) is a step — and a good long one — in that direction. Kertesz in the Termes Fnzetek, and elsewhere, has published several papers on south Asiatic diptera, and he has also published a useful catalogue of the described species of Pipunculidae of the world. Miss Ricardo, in the Annals of Xat. Hi^t., has given further notes on the I'angnninae in the British Museum collections, and Stein has written on Walker's Antlicnnyidae in the British Museum (Zeitschr. Ili/ni. Dipt.). Among American writers, Coquillet has published various notes and a " Systematic Arrangement of the Families of Diptera " [Proc. U.S. Xati())i. Mas.), while Doane, Tyler- Townsend, and others have contributed towards a knowledge of the north American fauna of diptera ; Hunter's ('atalmjue of Snntli American Dijitera, of which he has published a continuation, should prove a useful compilation. As far as the British Isles are concerned the most important work published during 1901 was Verrall's volume on the Plati/iiezidar, Pi])nnciilidae, and Syrphidae of Great Britain ; by its aid it should be possible for the British collector to name his captures in those families far more easily, and it will form a foundation upon which the British student can build, while the continental entomologists will undoubtedly find it of considerable assistance in the study of their fauna of diptera. The small band of British workers have added several species to their " List," among which may be mentioned Atlierix cra^isipes, Mg., Lophosia fasiiata, Mg., and Pachyyaster iiiero)iielas, Duf. ; Austen has published a descriptive paper {Fnt. Mo. May.) upon the last species, founding a new genus Neopachyyaster for its reception, and calling the species Xeo/)ae/iyyaster ineroiiielaena. In the same magazine I have endeavoured to distinguish the three British species of Heteroinyza, while Wainwright has given some notes on British TacJtinidae,BvAd\ey notes on British Trypetidae, and Henderson has written on the Tipulidae in the west of Scotland. NOTES ON THE BRITISH MYRJIECOPHILOUS FAUNA. 37 It is to be hoped that more attention will be.sfiveu to this nej^'lected order of insects during the coming year, and that by careful and con- scientious work greater progress may be made in 1902 than has taken place in 1901. Notes on the British Myrmecophilous fauna (excluding Coleopteraj. By HOKACE DONISTHOKPE, F.Z.S., E.E.S. {(Jontinued fr(»ii p. 18). Orthoptera. — Ahjrwcroplu'la accrroniin, Pauz. — Burr (Knt. Itecnnl, 1899, p. 187) calls attention to the fact that Westwood recorded this insect from Netley, where it had been taken in moss, but that further evidence is necessary to confirm it as British. Wasmann [lor. rit. p. 176) records it from north and mid-Europe. The big form ( $ adult) and medium ( 3 ?) with Formica fiisca and F. san;/iii)iea ; also with Lasiiis niijer, L. alicnus, MyrDiica laeviuadis, and Tctramoriiiiii caespitinn. If ants' nests were only more thoroughly worked in this country, it is possible that this interesting httle species would be found, and so confirm the old record. Neuroptera. — Neuroptera-Planipennia. — Heiiierobiiifi, sp. — I took several specimens of the curious larvfe of a species of this genus in the nest of Tmsjus fidiiiinosKx at Oxshott. They cover their bodies with the remains of their prey. As they feed on Aphidae it is probable that they were after the plant-lice of the ants. Pseudoneuroptera. — PsociD.E. — CacriUns fiavidiis, Steph. — Early in the year I took the very young larvae in the nests of Las'ms fulifii- ■nosKs and Foiiiiica rufa at Oxshott; later I took the nymph in the same nest of the former, and in October a fair number of the perfect insect in the same nest. The $ s laid their eggs shortly after capture in the tubes in which they were confined ; this suggests that the eggs would be laid in the nest. I have been told that this is a common insect and has nothing to do with ants, but it seems to me worthy of record, as the creature passed its earlier stages in the nests. Hagen has described a Psocid, Atropos formicaria, with this same ant in Prussia. Rhynchota. — Heteroptera. — Ali/dtiR cidcaratKs, L. — Saunders {Hrmip. fJcttrop. of the Ih\ Isles, p. 52) says this species is often found in company with Formica rufa. Wasmann {loc. cit., p. 179) records it from the nests of F rufa and /•'. r)ijiharl)is in Holland; the larva with Myrmica ndjra and the nymph with /''. sawjidnea in Finland. Piezostet/iKs formicetornm, Boh. — White {Scot. Xat., 1871, 2, p. 2(50) records this species from the nests of Formica rufa at Braemar. Douglas in quoting this record {Fnt. Mo. Marj., 1874-5, p. 174) remarks that it was a similar habitat to that in which it was first taken by Boheman. Wasmann {lor. cit., p. 181) gives its normal hosts as /• . rufa, pratensis, and truncictda. Ml/rmedohiacoleoptrata, Fall. — Douglas {Inr. rit., p. I'M) writes: " M. adeoptrata was found on a bank at Highgate in company with small black ants, but not in their nests. Neither sex is like an ant, and the apterous female resembles the coleopterous Alexia pilifera which was found at the same time and place. But as Herr Fieiienbach found the bugs in the ants' nests, it is certain that this want of similarity is no bar to the safety of the lodgers." I took a J in the nest of Lasixs fulijinosus at 0>iii\iott. Wasmann (/nc r/7., p. 181) mentions as its hosts 38 THE extojiologist's recokd . Fnniiica nij'a, /•'. pratt'iisis, Mi/niiica lavrinudis and Lasiiis t'ldiffinnxHs. VilujthorKfi bifasciattiii, F. (=Caiiiaro)iutiis cinncanaptcrus, Kir.). — Douglas (loc. rit.) says " Caniarowitiiscinnamaptenis, which in both sexes is very like a small I'onnica rufa .... is constantly found on trees, Ac, in company with that ant." Wasmann (loc. cit.,]). 182) records it with Formica iiratcnsis as well as 7*'. riifa. Pilophorui^ perplcxna, D. and Sc. — -Norman [Knt. Mo. Ma;/., 1878-79, p. 253) says " I saw some larvte of this species running up and down the stem of an apple tree among a number of Formica /W.srrt." Was- mann {loc. cit., p. 183) in quoting this record, which he attributes to Douglas in error, suggests that I.asins nii/rr, L., was the ant he found them with and not F. fiisca. I have taken it at Chiddingfold in 1898 run- ning about in the "runs" and on the trunk of an oak stump inhabited by Lasiiis fiili(/inosi(s. On September 18th, 1901, I took several specimens by beating aspens swarming with Lasiii-'i niijcr at Bexley. Si/stellonotKs triijiittatuR, L. — Douglas {Iw. cit., 1865-66, p. 30) records the capture of this species (J s, $ s, and pup*) in numbers with Formica fiisca at Weybridge. Saunders {Fnt. Mo. Mai/., 1892, p. 290) records it freely running amongst a colony of T,asins nit/cr at Chobham. Wasmann {loc. cit., p. 183) gives the host as Lasiittinii/cr, suggests that Douglas' record referred to L. nic. cit., p. 87) says that Dr. Puton records this species with ants, but he is not aware of its having been captured under such circumstances in this country. Mr. Jennings tells me he took it in an ants' nest at Dorking in 1897. Homoptera. — C'ercopid.e. — TypJdocyba cratactji, Douglas. — I took a young larva and later the perfect insect in the nest of Lasiusfidii/inosu.'i at Oxshott. It is perhaps worth mentioning that Belt has recorded the fact that in Nicaragua the larvfr of c«M-tain Jlnninptrra were assidu- NOTES ON THE BRITISH MYKHEOOPHILOUS FAUNA. 39 ously attended by ants for the sake of a sweet juice excreted by them. Mr. E. Green {Ent. Mo. Ma^/., 1900, p. 185) gives a note on the attractive properties of certain larval ILeiniptera. Aphidid.e. — Forda fonnicaria, C. Heyd. — Buckton (MiDKy/ra/i/i nf British Apliidae, vol. iv., p. 84) records specimens taken by Mr. -J. Hardy from Mi/niiica nests in Berwickshire, and by Sir John Lubbock at Beckeuham. He considers that there is abundant proof that l-'ania is a common companion of ants. Wasmann (lor. fit., p. 187) says it is found in the nests of most small species of ants, especially with Lasiu^t riai-Hs. He points out that all the old records of plant-lice with ants, such as Huber, Spence, F. Smith, &c., refer to this species. I have taken it in the nests of Lcxsiua jiarns in the Isle of Wight. Forda viridana, Buckt. — Buckton [loc. rit., iv., p. 85) records it as being found in small companies in ants' nests covered by tufts of various grasses, and that the malachite-green variety may often be taken in quantity, nesting with Formica fuliijinosa. Wasmann {loc. cit., p. 187) records it with L. Hams, in Bohemia. ParaiietKs cimicifonnis, C. Heyd. — -Buckton {loo. cit., iii., p. 67) says that this Aphid has been taken in the nest of F. rufa, and then usually in company with another underground species, Fnrda fonnicaria. New- stead {Knt. Mo. Mail., 1893, p. 115) records a colony of this species from a nest of i*. jiava at the Loggerheads, near Mold, North ^\'ales. Wasmann [hn-. cit., p. 187) says, "in a nest of F. rufa in Germany." Tychaca nctariae, Pass. — Buckton (bjc. cit., iv., p. 88) writes: '* Taken in ant-hills at Beckenham." Wasmann [Inc. cit., p. 187) captured it in a nest of Tetramorinin caespitnm in Bohemia. Tychaca triviaUs, Pass. — Buckton [loc.cit., iv., p. 86) says, " Taken in ants' nests at Beckenham." Wasmann [Ivc. cit,, p. 187) took it with Formica sanyuinea in Holland. Tycliaea sctidosa. Pass. — -Buckton [loc.cit., iv., p. 87) says Sir John Lubbock took it in ants' nests near Beckenham. Tychaca eraynjstidis, Buckt. — -Buckton [loc. cit., iv., p. 89) records it from ants' nests at Beckenham, and also at the Cheviot. Trama troylodytcs, Heyden. — Buckton (loc. cit., iii., p. 69) states that Sir John Lubbock found it in ants' nests at Beckenham, and Mr. Hardy in similar localities on the Grampian Hills. He further says it is common in the nests of M. rahra and F. fuliyinosa on the high moors in Berwickshire. Fndeis formicina, Buckt. — Buckton {loc. cit., iv., p. 91) writes : " In May they were numerous in the ant-hills under roots of Carex dioica. They mostly affected those nests of Formica umhrina, which were located on the dry slopes." Endcis jicllitcida, Buckt. — Buckton (loc. cit., iv., p. 92) writes: " Taken under tufts of grass, such as Poa annua, covering the nests of ants. . . . They were found at Beckenham in February." Endcis carnota, Buckt. — Buckton {loc. cit., iv., p. 92) records it in an ants' nest at Beckenham with several other Aphides, including Trama and Faraclctiis. Laclinus formicnpliiliis, Buckt. — -This new species to Britain and to science was described by Mr. Buckton {Science (jossip, Feb., 1901) from a S taken by me in a nest of Formica rufa, at Oxshott, in 1900. Coccid;e. — Lccanopsis furmicarum, Newst. — Newstead {Ent. Mo. May., 1893, p. 138) records two specimens sent him from a nest of Ijasius niycr, on the Chesil Beac-h, by Mr. Bale. 40 THE entomologist's record. Ripcrgia subtenanea, Newst. — Newstead {loc. cit., p. 79) records this species from the nest of Lasius flavus on a raised shingle beach at Ingoldisthorpe, near King's Lynn. Iiipersia to)nlini, Newst. — I first discovered this species in Britain on April 19th, 1901, in the Isle of Portland, where I found it in numbers in the nests of Lasiii>i lu'iicr. It was first described by Mr. Newstead from species taken by Miss Tomlin in nests of Tetraworium caespituin and Lasius alienns in Guernsey. I introduced specimens into my " observation nest " of F. ntfa ; the ants paid no attention to them beyond touching them with their antennse. I forced several ants to take hold of specimens of the Coccid, but they always dropped them without hurting them. They lived in the nest for some time, but died from the want of proper food, grasses, etc., to suck. Thysanura.— PoDURiD.E. — Bevkia alhina, Nicol. — Sir John Lubbock {loc. cit., p. 74) remarks that this insect belongs to the class of guests which reside actually in the galleries and chambers of, and with, the ants, but which the latter never touch. He continues, " It is an active bristling little being, and I have kept hundreds, I may say, thousands, in my nests. They run about in and out among the ants, keeping their antennae in a perpetual state of vibration." Wasmann {loc. cit., p. 189) refers to it as " Absolut panmyrmekophil." I have taken it with Fonnica rufa at Oxshott, Weybridge and the Blean Woods, with Lasius fulif/inosus at Oxshott, with Fmiuira sa)t;/uinea at Weybridge, and with Mynuica sulcinudis at Woking, and have often seen it running about in my " observation nest " of /•'. rufa. I last observed a specimen on January 8th, 1902, running about under a dead ant. Orchesella riiicta, L. — I have often found this species in numbers in the nests of Futinica rufa and Lasius fuli(/in»sus at Oxshott. {To he cotitinued.) On the systematic position of Gelastorrhinus, Brunner. By MALCOLM BURE. B.A., F.Z.S., F.E.S., F.L.S. In 1893, Brunner established this genus for a new species from Burmah, with the remark, " Ce genre affecte completenient la livree de certaines Tryxalides, notamment du genre americaiu Arhurum. La presence d'une dent minime sur le prosternum m'engage a le placer parmi les Mcsopcs. J 'en connais trois especes, dont une du Japon, une de Madagascar et de Ceylon, et la troisieme de Birmanie." This latter is described under the name G. alholineatus, and so becomes the type species. The species from Madagascar has been since described by de Saussure under the name (i. edax; a little over a year ago I had the opportunity to study these insects, and found also a new species from Java and from Sikkim, so there are five species in the genus, of which two are already described. V'eiy closely allied to Gelastorrhinus is JUiaiiinotatuui, McNeill, with the single species, Jl. brevipemw, Thos., but this genus is next to Achuruiu, Sauss., in position, also an American genus, containing a couple of species. But Achurum is ranged by Brunner in the group Hi/alojitcri/i/cs, that is, in the Truxalidac, and, on a close comparison, it will be found impossible to separate Gclastorrliinus, so that, in spite of a minute tubercle upon the sternum, it miist be removed from its unnatural position among the NOTES ON THE HARTTS AND T.lKPMTTSTOnY OF OBGYIA SPLENDTP.N. 11 Mesopes in the Acridiidac, and take its place with Achiirum and Rhadinotatum in the Tnixalidae. It is so " Truxaline " in appearance, that it has long been a temptation to effect this move, but orthopterists have always said, " it has a tubercle on the sternum, therefore it must be of the Artidiiilac.''' But this tubercle is an arbitrary character, which must be treated as a servant and not as a master ; these genera are so Truxaline in every other character that the accumulation of other points must outweigh this little tubercle. I have proposed this change to Brunner himself, and it has met with his emphatic approval. The order of the genera occurring in the first group in Brunner' s arrangement of the Tni.mlidar in his llevision in 1898, will therefore be as follows: — Airida, Htal. { = Tni.i-alis, Fabr.), then the three genera AcJuirum, Rhadinatatum and (Telastnrr/iiniis; these are followed by Hyaldptt'rijx, Charp., and 'J'nixalii^, Fabr. {:^Metaleptca, Brunner) together, following which are CalaiiiHs, Sauss., with Karsch's African genera, (Tli^phodonns Sjiid Aid phi(re)iuia, with Odo)itonidi(K,'Bo\.; then Oxijolena, Karsch, and finally Aniyrus, Stal., and Machaeridia, Stal. Notes on the habits and life=history of Orgyla splendida {in'th plate). By T. A. CHAPMAN, M.D., F.Z.S., F.E.S. During the visit of Mr. Champion and myself to the Albarracin district of Spain last summer, we found at Cuenca a cocoon of ()n/(/ia duhia var. splendida, under a stone, and another, together with a larva, at Tragacete. I believe we saw the moth on the wing at Cuenca, at Tragacete, and at Albarracin. On a wooded ridge, near Bronchales, a good many moths were seen Hying, but none were captured. Noting that my first cocoon contained a female moth that had laid some eggs in her cocoon, and that she seemed to be an On/i/ia, I concluded that she belonged to the (K splendida of which we had seen several males on the wing, and of which I had taken one or two. This called to my mind something I had heard or read about the pairing of some of these Orgyias, but when or where I could not remember. I have tried to find out where I had read this, and to discover some reference to the habits of 0. splendida, but have failed. The only reference I have unearthed is an account by Dr. Breyer in the Belgian Entomological Society's Anncdes of the history and pairing of fh-iji/iaerieae. As others may be as ill-informed on this matter as I was myself, it may not be useless to record my observations on O. splendida, and, though I think it probable that the facts are already somewhere reported, a confirma- tion of them may not be altogether superfluous. O. antiijua, as everyone knows, has a female with well developed legs and rudimentary wings. She emerges from her cocoon, which she never leaves, and lays her eggs on its oixter surface. In (>. (/<>n- ostiijnia the history is the same, with the interesting difference that there is an outer loose cocoon, or netAvork of silk, beneath which the female moth remains, laying her eggs on the inner, true cocoon. This is a step onwards towards the habit of (>. ericae, which, according to Dr. Breyer, emerges from her chrysalis sufficiently to make a small open- ing in it, but does not emerge from it, but reverses her position in the chrysalis case, so that pairing takes place through this opening, the male outside, the female inside the cocoon. He does not say bow the 42 THE entomologist's record. cocoon is pierced, but I gather that he believes a weak place exists, such as is left for the emergence of the moth in the cocoon of so many species, and that the ovipositor of the moth penetrates this. He care- fully notes that the moth preserves the pupal covering of the head, which still covers her anterior extremity Avhen she has reversed herself in the chrysalis case, and specially dwells on this as showing that before her reversal she has thus provided an opening in the pupa-case, but he says nothing about the cocoon. To return to our (>. Hphndida. Finding in the examination of my first specimen that I had an Ori/i/ia whose female did not emerge from the cocoon, I concluded that it must belong to the same species as the males we had observed, and the idea occurred to me that my other two specimens might give me the opportunity to observe something of the pairing habits of the species. The cocoons are quite sufficiently transparent to enable one to see the enclosed pupa against the light, and my second cocoon appeared to contain an undisturbed pupa. The first specimen showed that the pupa-case is exceedingly flimsy, and that the moth, in emerging from it, or afterwards, breaks it up into small fragments, retaining, however (as Dr. Breyer records of , and labium. Of these the second is the longest and about -Sram. in length, the first and third shorter, and the 4th shortest. Above the first the front of the head is marked off by an encircling groove at this aspect. Below and beside this joint, and a little beyond the end of the ridge marking the labrum, is a rounded elevation, the antennae, and in the mature pupa some dark eye pigment, just farther out than this. Its disposition suggests, perhaps, rather the larval than the imaginal eye. Just below the antennte the second ridge has, at its outer extremities, two elevations, which probably represent the jaws. The third ridge has the maxillary palpi very obscurely if at all repre- sented, and the fourth has at each end an actual labial palpus, projecting from the pupal surface and apparently of two minute joints. Below these are the thoracic legs, each as an appendage at the end of a central transverse elevation, following on as a series those of the head, the first depressed in the middle and suggesting that it repre- sents the trochanters of each side, the third comparatively large. The legs are each about 1mm. in length and consist of a minute coxa, a short femur, a tibia which is much the greater part of the leg, and a tarsus small and not obviously jointed. The legs lie flatly on the pupa, but are quite free, not adherent to the pupa or to each other. Of wings there are no traces, but there are on the thoracic segments some irregularities, ranging with those representing the lateral flanges on the abdominal segments. The prothoracic spiracle cannot be made out (in the preserved specimen) but the flrst seven abdominal spiracles are very distinct, and of a definite brown colour. The pupa terminates in a very definite cremastral knob, almost a little globe (-Smm in diameter), carrying some ordinary hairs and several stronger browner ones diverging to either side. The texture of the pupal skin is extremely flimsy and delicate. It cannot be removed from the moth except in bits, and the moth itself breaks it up in this way when escaping it. The representation of the mouthparts as four segments (pi. i., fig. 1), pre- cisely comparable with the thoracic ones, in a moth so high as On/i/ia, is especially worthy of notice. The $ moth is of similar form to that of the pupa. Her head is invisible, only that of the pupa-case which continues to cover it being seen. 8he is of a rather deep blackish-brown, owing to a continuous pile of short hairs. I do not know where the hairs come from that she deprives herself of to place amongst her eggs, but I fancy they come from the whole surface, rather than altogether from the seventh segment. If this be so, then she has a long set of deciduous hairs mixed with the shorter persistent ones. The legs (pi. i., figs. 2 a, I, r) are very short, thick, and strong, barely a millimetre in length, including their attach- ment ; they have a femur •2.5mm. thick, and the tibia is over •2mm. They consist of a good wide basal plate, lying flat on the body of the moth, rising a little to the articulation. This is probably the trochanter. The coxa can hardly be made out distinctly, but is, apparently, present. The femur is barely twice as long as thick, swollen irregu- larly in form ; the tibia is not twice as long as thick, it is flask-shaped, NOTES ON THE HABITS AND LIFE-HISTORY OF ORGYIA SPLENDIDA. 45 tapering to the tarsal end. Beyond this is apparently only one piece, equal to the tarsus and claws ; it is a solid knobbed mass carrying two very strong, very curved claws, more than 0-12mm. in length, if measured along the curvature. There are a few bristles on the femur and tibia, the colour of the legs is darker than the rest of the moth, but not quite black. The cocoon is brown, with admixture of larval hairs, it is quite soft. On cutting one open late in November, the moth, much shrivelled, but not absolutely dried up, was near the opening. The eggs, being quite loose, fell out at once, leaving the cocoon filled with a light brownish wool, which a mere breath of air at once diminishes much in quantity. One cocoon contained about 130,another ITOeggs. Theseeggs (pl.i., figs. 3-1) are very large, and look as if made of white porcelain. They are a little flattened, especially at the base. Their diameter is l-7mm., and height l-2mm. Taking the egg of (>. antiqna for comparison, that of (J. splendida is more than twice the diameter, viz., l-7mm. against 0-8mm. That of 0. antiqna (pi. i., figs. 5-6), however, is of a height equal to its width, notwithstanding the cup-like flattening of the micropylararea, so that the egg oiO. splcndida isonly halfas high again as thatof <>. antiqna, viz., l'2mm. against 0-8mm. The micropylar rosette is 0-03mm. in diameter, surrounded by an area 0-4mm. in diameter, in which the cells of the surface netting are very small, viz., O-OlTmm. in diameter, outside this they are about 0-03mm. The network is not very strongly marked, and the lines little raised, more so within the micro- pylar area than outside. At this date the greater number of the eggs are unchanged, containing only yolk material like those of (>. antiqna, but one or two having a darker appearance were found to contain a mature, but dead caterpillar. The dorsal area of the abdominal segments of the young larva is fully occupied by tubercles i, ii, and iii, ii being very large, and encircling i posteriorly ; iii rounded ; i and iii with about twelve long hairs, ii with about twenty. The prolegs have two very long crochets marking each end of the semicircle of hooks, the intermediate ones very minute and hardly developed. On the 2nd and 3rd thoracic segments the tubercles are in one transverse row, of which ii is the largest, each with many hairs. On the 1st thoracic there is a row of tubercles in front and a thoracic plate behind them. Explanation of Plate I.* Diagrammatic notes from camera sketches : 1. Anterior extremity (front view) of pupa of Orfin'ia iiplciidida ? , showing eyes and antennse, mouth-parts apparently arranged as four successive segments, and thoracic legs. No trace of wings x 11. 2. Legs of 0. splendida ? , magnified x 24. h. Eight first leg. c. Right intermediate leg. a. Left posterior leg. The differences are due more to aspect than to structure. 3-G. Eggs of O. i^plendida and O. antiqna to show relative form and size : 3. Egg of O. splendida from above x 15. 4. Egg of O. splendida from side x 15. 5. Egg of O. antiqna from above X 15. 6. Egg of U. antiqna from side > 15. * PI. i. published with the .January number is hereljy i-ancelled, owing to inac- curacies in the drawing. That published with the current (Feb.) number is the one to which reference should be made. 46 THE entomologist's record. Entomological Souvenirs.' By J. W. TUTT, F.E.S. Twelve months ago, when our leading entomologists wrote the series of interesting and informing articles published in the Century nos. (Jan. and Feb.) of the Kntotn. Record, one was at once struck with the distinct line of cleavage, showing, more or less, two distinct types of mental training in the writers, that appeared not only in the line taken by the writers, but also in their evident views as to the broad bases on which, in their opinion, entomology should be studied. On the one side was the satisfaction expressed at the facts amassed and the work chronicled of our knowledge of things ; on the other was an implied dissatisfaction that so many evidently capable thinkers and observers largely wasted their best efforts by species- describing and mere reference work, and did not, therefore, add anything at all, com- mensurate with the time spent, to our knowledge of the vital activities of the organic beings they studied, and hence brought us no nearer to the problems bearing on the phenomena of life. Amongst those entomologists who have taken a foremost place in drawing our attention to the functional activities of insects and their variation under different external stimuli, is Mr. Merrifield, and it is to him that we largely owe the translation of Fabre's earliest work. He has long wished to bring the observations of our illustrious neighbour under the immediate ken of British entomolo- gists, recognising that if our collectors were once brought under the influence of the methods of such a naturalist — if they once understood that in the open fields real science was to be studied in more interest- ing and complicated forms than is possible in the closet, museum, or library, from the dried bodies of the victims we profess to love — a force would be brought to bear on our favourite pursuit that would be irresistible in the advance it would make, and would turn to real scientific purposes much of the more or less useless collecting that takes place, perhaps, nowhere so extensively as in this country, although the disease seems very generally distributed in Central Europe. Fabre, " that inimitable observer " as Darwin called him, obtained his earliest inspiration from Leon Dufour, and his first published ento- mological work, that gained the honours of the Institute of France, was the complement of Dufour's marvellous account of the manner in which Cercerif: btiprentica fed its progeny on Bitjtrestis hifamata. His account of how he was led to become an entomological observer is graphically told. He relates how, one winter evening, beside a stove where the ashes were yet warm, while his family slept, he was forgetting, while he read, all the cares of the morrow (as professor of physics he was then earning the princely salary of £Qi per year), when he chanced to light on the entomological pamphlet by Leon Dufour, to which we have just referred. He says : "Certainly, long ere this, I had felt a great interest in insects ; from childhood I had delighted in beetles, bees, and butterflies ; so far back as I can recollect I see myself enraptured by the splendours of a beetle's elytra or the wings * " Insect Life," by J. H. Fabre, D.Sc. Edited by F. Merrifield, F.E.S. , with a preface by Dr. D. Sharp, F.E.S. Price, Gs. (Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1901.) ENTOMOLOGICAL SOUVENIRS. 47 of a swallow-tail butterfly. The luaterials lay ready on the hearth, but the spark to kindle them had been lacking. The accidental perusal of Leon Dufour's pamphlet was that spark. I had a mental revelation. So, then, to arrange lovely beetles in a cork box, to name and classify, was not the whole of science ; there was something far superior, viz., the close study of the structure, and still more of the faculties of insects." One cannot doubt that the perusal of a book like that of Fabre will open up to many a young naturalist horizons whose very existence he had never guessed, and will throw wide open the gates of a new world where henceforward he will use his mental powers, possibly in a direction in which they have hitherto lain entirely dormant. To mention in a haphazard manner a fact here and there in the book would be purposeless, and leave probably an entirely wrong im- pression. The author's detailed observations made upon Scarabaeus mcer are excellent. He criticises clearly and concisely the conclusions of Blanchard, shows that Scambaois saccr does not call his friends to help him in difficult places, and proves that there is neither com- munity of labour nor community of family, that the eager fellow- worker, under pretence of giving a helping hand, cherishes the project of carrying off the ball of dung at the earliest opportunity. He has seen pillagers and pillaged, and nothing else, and if a number of beetles surround the same ball it means battle, and he concludes that, outside of the cares of maternity — cares in which it almost always shows itself admirable — the insect, unless, indeed, it lives in society, like bees and ants and some others, thinks of and cares for nothing but itself. His account of the cells in which the young Scarabaeus is reared is alto- gether admirable. But it is in his description of the habits of the Hymenoptera that Fabre excels. The thrilling way in which he carried out his experi- ments on the habits of Ccn-eris buin-estica, the manner in which he proves that Dufour was wrong in his views that the poison injected into the Buprestids was an antiseptic preserving the latter from decay till the larva of Cerceris had devoured it, and how he him- self shows that the poison does not kill, that life is still there — life latent and passive — vegetative life, the destruction of the nervous centres that control movement and volition, yet allowing the functions of the viscera to proceed sufficiently to maintain a deep slumber, which will never be broken, and yet which is not death, ceasing only when the intestine is empty, are all equally delightful. His account of the hunting of Cfrccris tubcindata, which preys on the weevil, CleonuK opldJiahnicm, the mining feats it accomplishes in storing its prey for its young, the reason why ('leoniiH oplitliahnivuH is almost exclusively chosen (one ( '. alternant and a single Jjot/ii/rodercs albidus torm the only exception), the more varied larder of Ccrccris arcnaria, Ccnrris aiirita, Ccrceris frrreri, ('. ijuadyicincta, ('. labiata, and ('. jidii, whilst Cerceris ornata brings up its family on Hymenop- tera, are exceedingly interesting. The stored weevils, like the stored Buprestids, remain for days (sometimes for weeks) perfectly fresh, though permanently motionless. No less stimulating is his description of the habits of Spltcx jlavipennis, which hunts field crickets, and here one meets with another robber, Tachijtes nii/ra, which he found to lay its eggs in the store laid up by the Sp/tcr, the latter evidently afraid to drive it from the burrow it had usurped. Tar/ii/frs dhxnlfta, banded 48 THE entomologist's record. white round the abdomen like Sjiluw albmcta, is supposed similarly to utilise for its own egg-laying the stores laid by the latter. To follow the author through his account of the ways of .S. jiavipennh is impos- sible. As to the conditions of the food stored, Fabre says : "Crickets sacrificed by S. fiavijioutis are no more dead, in spite of all appear- ances, than are Aveevils- struck by a Cera-ris. The flexibility of the integuments displays the slightest internal movement. If one closely observes a cricket stretched on its back a week, or even a fortnight or more after the murder, one sees the abdomen heave strongly at long intervals. Very often one can notice a quiver of the palpi and marked movements in the antennae and the bands of the abdomen, which separate and then come suddenly together. By putting such crickets into glass tubes I have kept them perfectly fresh for six weeks. Con- sequently, the ^pliex larvte, which live less than a fortnight before enclosing themselves in their cocoons, are sure of fresh food as long as they care to feast." It is quite beyond the space at our disposal to give any further details. His notes on A)umupli'da hirsuta, A. sabidom, and A. holo- sericea, Bembex rostrata, B. tarmta, Cerceris tnberciilata, Chalicuduitia wiiraria and other mason bees, are all equally delightful and interest- ing. To those who are interested in the so-called intelligence of insects, and who draw conclusions as to their actions based on the human standpoint, the book is absolutely necessary as a corrective. The conclusion of his chapter on " The Ignorance of Instinct " is delightful, and the author's views are proved, one feels, most com- pletely. He says: "Instinct knows everything in the unchanging paths laid out for it ; beyond them it is entirely ignorant. The sub- lime inspirations of science, the astonishing inconsistencies of stupidity, are both its portion, according as the creature acts under normal con- ditions or under accidental ones." The Entomological Society of London honoured itself in electing M. Fabre one of its honorary Fellows recently. To Mr. Merrifield's insistence on procuring an English translation, and to the talented lady who has translated the diflficult Provencal so excellently, every field naturalist owes a debt of gratitude. The book is clearly printed, well illustrated, and the contents are altogether delightful. We hope that when fathers have read and re-read the book they will hand it on to their children, for in such books as this lies the training of our future naturalists. To our educationalists we commend pp. 271-274 ; we suspect that in some districts of England things are not much better even now, and if Cockertonian views are to prevail, as seems all too likely, in a few years' time things may even be worse. :^OTES ON COLLECTING, Etc. Lepidopteka at Seathwaite. — I had long anticipated spending a week in the neighbourhood of Seathwaite, the main object being the capture of Mdampias cjn'phrou. I had already made three or four unsuccessful attempts to do so, and considered that a week must give me at least one fine day in this, the wettest place in the kingdom. With Mr. J. Malcolm, I left Carlisle on the afternoon of June 15th, 1901, for Keswick, where we were fortunate in getting a ride to Lodore. A\'e, however, still had several miles to walk in the hot sun, hampered NOTES ON COLLECTING. 49 by the necessary impedimenta for a week's collecting, but, in spite of the fatigue, we took lenilia maculata, Drepana falcataria, and Brenthis selene on the way, finally reaching our destination by 8 p.m. After a good meal we set out to collect in a wood about a mile away, and unexpectedly met Mr. Thwaites, who was also collecting here. We found Abraxas sylvata plentiful, and in good condition, and many insects occurred at dusk, the best being Ci/niatop/iora jinclHosa and C duplaris. We left Mr. Thwaites applying sugar to the trees, and this was the last we saw of him during our stay. The locality around Seathwaite proved to be a very good one for many of the mountain species. We made two ascents to Sprinkling Tarn, but both days were unfavourable, and, after a long search among the grass, only one Crawhna furcatelhai was taken. At Styhead a better state of things existed, this place being rather sheltered, and we took a few dark forms of Coenonympha pamphilus, and further down the mountain, at various times, captured among the rocks Larentia salicata and Mdanippf galiata, also the pretty little Fi/rausta piirpuraiis and Ennijchia cin- gulata. Fortunately, we came across a man who assured us that we might get any quantity of M. ciiiphron in the Honister Pass. Accord- ingly, we went there, and found it very common, and although it was only the second week in June they showed unmistakable signs of wear. The species proved to be extremely common in various places above a certain altitude, not confining itself altogether to boggy places on the mountain-side, as some writers assert, e.g., we found it common on very dry ground at the top of Honister Pass, yetiwdplnla planta- gmis ab. Im^ipita and Crambiis fiitratcUiis were also taken, as well as a few larv8e of Characas //raininis, on our return, and a fine specimen of (JuculUa unihratira. Two or three excursions were made later to Honister Pass, and on two occasions we had the company of Mr. Mousley, of Bradford, and Mr. Glenny, of Wisbech, Avho came specially to take il/. epiphron ; they were lucky enough to get two fine days, and made a good haul. We had a few fair nights at sugar, when we took the following species : T/u/atira bati.^, t'lpiiatophora jiid-tiiosa, Triaena psi, Pharetra ruwicis, Crairiophora Ivjustri, Hadoia tJialassina, II. cunticjua, H. oleracea, H. dentina, H]ipi>a rectilinea, Aplecta pramia, Xi/lophasia rurea, Enphwia liicipara, Noctna jilecta, and liimina tenehrom. The best night I ever remember at sugar was the Friday night of this week, when moths literally swarmed, the predominating species being Kuplexia liici- para ; even the sugaring brvxsh, which was stuck up in a stone wall, was covered with this species. We filled our boxes on the first round and had to go back to the farm to empty them into ammonia bottles. On our return the same lively state of things existed. Having gone round half the trees, an unfortunate accident happened — Mr. Malcolm stumbled over a stone and broke the paraftin stable-lamp, which we had borrowed from the farm, and abruptly ended the most successful night I ever had at sugar. We returned home on the following Saturday with our spoil, and on our walk to Keswick took An/ynnis aylaia and a nice lot of Aylah urticae, and also Spihmnna nient/ia.itri, which were in evidence all along the road. Towards Keswick we took a few webs containing larva of IJypimoinciita padclla, which form very conspicuous objects near the main road. On the whole, we had a fairly successful week, considering how noted the place is for rain. — Malcolm Dixon, Carlisle. January 9th, 1902. 60 THE entomologist's record. Epunda ltjtulenta in Herts. — Last autumn I spent three days — September 10th to 12th — at Weston Vicarage, five miles from Stevenage. Whilst watching some tobacco plants between 6.30 and 7 p.m. for Plilcficthontiiin convolfidi (of which I saw several, but captured only one) I noticed a black speck in the centre of a tobacco flower. I thought it could not be Plasia (/amnta, as it was settled, and quite motionless, but was hardly prepared on boxing it to find that it was a fine male Epunda lutulenta — a species I had never taken before. As Mr. A. E. Gibbs, of St. Albans, who is making out the Hertfordshire list of insects for the Victoria County History, informs me that the species is new to the county, perhaps you may deem the record worthy of insertion in your magazine. — (Rev.) G. H. Raynor, M.A., Hazeleigh Rectory, Maldon, Essex. Jamianj 8tli, 1902. Autumnal Lepidoptera in Merioneth, etc. — I spent the last week of September and the first week of October, 1901, at Aberdovey, in Merionethshire. Though so late in the season there were more insects about than I expected to find. My captures included a worn example of Sphin.r cimntlruli at rest on a wall, Epunda niiira going over, E. licltoiea, X}ilina ornitnpux [rJii^olitlia), Calocaiiipa rctitsta, Peridrtniia aancia, P. ypsilon, AncJiocclis Difina, A. hniosy a hard integument — by the assimilation of colour or form to environment — by adopting colours in strong contrast to environment (warning colours) — by protective atti- tudes— by warning attitudes — by warning sounds — by the secretion of distasteful juices or odorous substances^-by resemblance to un- pleasant substances such as the droppings of birds — by resemblance to well -protected insects other than Coleoptera such as ants, bees and wasps — by imitating other genera and species of the same order which are plainly distasteful. In the course of the Address it was pointed out how easily it can be proved that beetles form a large part of the food of birds, as their hard elytra or wing-cases remain for some time entire in their stomachs ; in this way it can be proved which species are most liked, and which are disliked or rejected ; it is an interesting fact that many of the rapacious birds devour large numbers of beetles, and that a systematic examination of their stomachs proves that the damage done to game is much less than is usually believed, for many of the most persecuted species are mainly, or to a very great extent, insectivorous ; it would be well, therefore, on all grounds, that the indiscriminate slaughter of our few remaining birds of prey should be rigorously discountenanced. Professor Sven Lampa, the well known President of the Swedish State Entomological Department, in one of his valuable articles on economic entomology, takes occasion to point out {l\)it. Tvlshrift, xxii., p. 180) "that Linne's and Bjerkander's descriptions of the appearance and mode of life of their Noctiia tritid agree entirely with those of HuiJoia hasilinca, Fab.," and on the strength of this he uses the synonymy Hcuhna fr/7/r/, L., Bjerk. = />((.s/7/;/rt/. Fab. et Auct. It is highly probable that Professor Lampa may be right with regard to Bjerkander, but as we cannot reconcile Lmne's description of tritici in the Si/iitciiia Xattirac with any known form of Ajiaiiica hasilinca, and as the extant Linnean type is a normal Atimtis tritici, we think it would be very rash to accept the correction (?) without much stronger evidence than has yet been offered. The Annual Meeting of the Lancashire and Cheshire Entomological Society was held at the Royal Institution, Liverpool, on January 13th. The following Officers were then elected to serve during 1902 : — Presi- dent, Mr. S. L. Capper, F.L.S., F.E.S. ; Vice-Presidents, Rev. R. Freeman, M.A., and Dr. H. Dobie ; Secretaries, Messrs. Frederick Birch, and E. .1. B. Sopp, F.R.M.S., F.E.S. ; Treasurer, Dr. .J. Cotton, F.E.S. ; Librarian, Mr. F. C. Thompson; Council, Messrs. R. Wilding, F. N. Pierce, F.E.S., A. Tippins, H. Tonkin, and W. A. Tyerman. In the absence of the President the retiring Vice-President Mr. R. Wilding, delivered a most interesting address, reviewing in an exhaustive manner the general entomological work and literature of the first year of the century, with special reference to several matters of local importance. We learn that Mr. C. 0. Waterhouse has " seven," not " two, "years to serve at the Natural History Museum before reaching the retiring age. PKACTICAL HINTS. 55 Jp>RACTICAL HINTS.* Field Work for February and March. By J. W. TUTT, F.E.S. 1. — By the middle of February, the pupae of iJimor/iha rirsicolora kept in a "warm room, will commence to emerge from their cocoons, often coming right out and lying exposed for a few days before the emergence of the imagines. Many pupa? go over to a second or third year. All those that will emerge this year are fully formed some time before emergence ; the rest are still fluid. 2. — The females of D'unoriiha versicnlom should be allowed to pair more than once, otherwise a fair number of eggs will be sometimes found to be infertile ; the ova should be kept in the shade or not exposed to the full rays of the sun until they begin to hatch. 3. — In confinement place fertilised $ s of THumviiha rcrsimldra on birch twigs ; they bungle badly sometimes in attempting to lay in a cardboard box, but go ahead steadily, laying their eggs in little batches, on a large fresh birch -twig. 4. — The eggs of Diiiion)ha irn^icolora found in the woods, are laid in little batches of six to eight or so, in double rows on small outside twigs of birch, 2ft. to 4ft. from the ground ; the eggs are pale yellow at first, but after a day or two, darken to a purple-brown colour, just the tint of the birch twigs. 5. — Brephos notJia occurs in March on the outsku-ts of a wood near Broxbourne, in which are a few aspens, they begin to fly about 10 a.m., at which time they are, like B. parthcnias, very sluggish and easy to capture ; at midday they retreat into the wood but about 2.15 p.m. they appear again in numbers on the sheltered side of the wood (Battley). 6. — The sap exuding from freshly-cut dogwood stems proved of such superior attraction to the usual sallow-loving insects, that the sallows were practically blank, and each stem of cat dogwood was covered with moths (Thornhill). 7. — The larvfe of Lrurania alhi/nijicta feed only at night, but may be found by day concealed on the ground, under leaves of low plants — mullein, hemlock, teasel, etc. (Brahin). 8.- — Pnlia niiirocincta is reputed to be difficult to breed in confine- ment in the south, but has been fed up in the open on potted plants of narrow-leaved plantain (Whittle), and on sallow (Bower), the moths emerging in September. 9. — As a substitute for the usual food-plant of larvR? of Tiliacea uiirago, which sometimes hatch very early, it may be noted that sycamore buds are very acceptable, the larvse feeding on them without hesitation (Butler). 10. — The larvae of Geometra papilionaria, sleeved out on birch, nibble the bark and buds in March, as do those of Boa nit ia mboraria. They want removing to a new branch early, as their nibbling often tends to kill the twigs. * Pkactical Hints fob the Field Lepidoptehist, recently published, contains 1250 similar hints to these, distributed over every month in the year. Interleaved (for collectors own notes). — Ed. 56 THE entomologist's record. 11. — The ? s of Phigalia pedaria and Nyssia hispidaria, which are comparatively seldom seen in the daytime, may sometimes be taken freely by examining the trunks of trees in woods Avith a light after dark in February and March (Porritt). 12. — Boaiiiiia repandata is a very interesting species to breed, the larvie may be found on mild evenings in early spring, feeding on all sorts of low-growing plants — ivy, honeysuckle and bramble appearing to be those most frequently selected (jMason). 13. — Roots of Achillea jitannira growing in a damp spot in Epping Forest in early March, contained larvie of a bone- white colour with light brown head, the imagines from these appeared in June, and proved to be IHclirorhainplia alju'strana (Thurnall). 14. — Lepto(iraiiiiiia scutiDta is to be found on birch trunks in spring; by sleeving the ? on birch trees long series may be bred. It is a mistake to let the larvie spin up in the muslin, as they are long in turning and ichneumons sting them through the meshes. la. — The larva' of ( liri/siipluimis jildcwas are sometimes very common on lUoiux jnilcln-r, in February and March ; they are difficult to see as their bodies are about the same size as, and the crimson dorsal line and broader spiracular stripe render them very like, the young curled-up leaves in the centre of the plant (Bate). J^CIENTIFIC NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS. Emergence ok Ci-,(jstera hybrids. — For some years now I have bred a good number of the hybrid (lustcra rn-liisa 7/?fs var. ai'i/idiou and P. aeijon var. aljnna were also abundant, and fji/cacua alcon, very fresh, was also in fair numbers, both 3 and $ . I'oh/uin- matits orbitiiliis was not quite so numerous as it no doubt would have been later, but ('. palaeno, in all its Swiss forms, and Picris callidive, were abundant, and I also took some large specimens of Parnas^inK mneiiiosi/nc in excellent condition at this unusual height (some 7000ft.), though at Berisal they were beginning to be worn, Friday I spent again at the fifth refuge, where my captures were much like those of Tuesday, except that I took several /'. rhliiis $ . On Saturday, by walking down early to Breig, and, taking train to Leuk, I got some hours in the Pfynwald, my object being to find Li/cacna meleaaer and Apatura ilia J ; I took two of the latter and three or four of the former, but the Orobns nir/fr was not yet in blossom, and so there was no special attraction to bring mdcaA\Ci a few TAmmitix impuli from Poschiavo, five lAbijtlu'a celtis from Brusio, a number of Krebia rrijdu/lr, and a set of seven E. flam- faaciata from the neighbourhood of Pontresina, six ^ and one $ , all but the last being in splendid condition. On November 13th I again examined his collection, in company with Chanoine Favre,and M.Wull- schlegel ; one of the most interesting specimens is a hybrid between C. palacno and (.'. phicoinunc, taken some years ago, but the locality of w^hich he has unfortunately not noted. In the same week I had also the pleasure of seeing the magnificent collection of Colonel Agassiz, at Lausanne, in company with Mr. Sloper. A visit to Geneva at the end of the month procured me the acquaintance of Professor Blachier, who most kindly put both his own collection and that of the University Museum at my disposal for examination, notes, &c., and who also gave me much information and offered lists and dates of his captures. One piece of information received from him is of special interest to collectors in Switzerland, viz., that a few Lampidcs tclicaiins are now taken every year in the gardens in and near Geneva. May I add that I should be greatly obliged if any other readers of the Ent. lii'conl would send to me, at the Pension Masson, Veytaux, lists of localities and dates both for Switzerland and the other Alps of Central Europe, as I hope, if possible, to include the latter in the handbook on which I am at work. Varieties and local forms have a special interest. Resident entomologists, both native and foreign, have been most kind. Much of the pleasure of the entomological year has been 62 THE ENTOMOLOGIST S RECORD. due to the hours spent with Chaiioine Favre, Pi'ofessoi- Blachier, Colonel Agassiz, Messrs. Pison, Sloper, Wullschleyel, Lemann, and others, who have put time and information and collections at my disposal. Some New Nearctic Fleas {ivith plate). By The Hon. N. C. ROTHSCHILD, B.A., F.L.S. Pitlex ursi, sp. nov. (Fig. !•). — The rostrum reaches to the middle of the trochanter, and the end segment of the palpus is about twice the length of the preceding one, being a little longer in the male than in the female. The head, which is clothed with short hairs, is feebly but evenly rounded in the male, but angled in the female. There are four long bristles between the eye and the maxilla, standing in a row, preceded by a series of three shorter ones. Near the posterior edge of the head there is a series of long bristles, and between these and the antennal groove there are two series of four and three (or three and two) somewhat shorter ones. The prothorax bears no comb, having only a subapical series of bristles ; the meso- and metanotum bear in addition to the subapical bristles, a postmedian series. The metathoracic episternum bears a number of bristles, and the epimeron is furnished with a subapical series of nine, which are placed close together, the series being preceded by one or two less regular rows. The plates of the abdominal segments are small, the tergites bear two rows of bristles, sometimes exhibiting some irregularly placed hairs in addition ; the series is reduced in number, however, on the distal segments. The seventh tergite lacks the dorsal apical hairs usually present in so many species. The eighth tergite of the female is completely divided in the mesial line, it is, moreover, large, dilated ventrally, and rather densely clothed with hairs above and below the stigma, as well as upon the broader ventral portion. The anal tergite of the female lacks the two processes usually present in Ptdc.r and other genera. The eighth sternite of the male does not essentially differ from the seventh, while in the female it is I'educed to a mere chitinous strip. This resemblance between the seventh and eighth sternites in the male of the present species is most peculiar ; in fact, in this character, the present species differs from all other members of the group Siphonaptera that I know of. The sternites bear a single row of hairs. The mid- and hind-coxa? are densely clothed with hairs in front. The femora bear two stout spines at their ends, and in addition to the rather long hairs on their dorsal edges, there is a more or less regular longitudinal ventro-lateral series on each side. The tibiae bear six pairs of very stout spines at their dorsal edges, and exhibit, besides, a lateral row of bristles. The tarsi are clothed with stout bristles, their segments being short, except the apical one — the fore-tarsus, the first four segments gradually decrease in size, the first being a quarter longer than it is broad ; the bristles on all of these four tarsal segments are subapical ; the first segment, moreover, has, in addition, an externo-lateral pair of bristles in the middle ; the for.rth segment is calyx-shaped, with strongly rounded sides. The iiiid-tar;;u3 is similar to the pro-tarsus, except that its first four segments are somewhat longer, the first segment being about half as long again as it is broad. The basal segment of the hind-tarsus is about twice as long as it is broad, the fourth segment is barely different in size and shape from that one of the mid- and pro-tarsus. The end segments of all the tarsi are of nearly equal size, being about twice as long as they are broad ; they have four stout spines on each side and an apical hair, with two apical ventral bristles in addition. A portion of the genital armature of the male is drawn in fig. 1. The clasper (c) is broad, roun